Pulse or digital communications – Testing – Data rate
Reexamination Certificate
1998-09-17
2002-02-26
Corrielus, Jean (Department: 2631)
Pulse or digital communications
Testing
Data rate
C709S232000, C370S252000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06351487
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present embodiments relate to digital subscriber line (“DSL”) technology, and are more particularly directed to a system with a modem device driver using a communication window size based on relative data rates of upstream and downstream communications.
The exchange of digital information between remotely located computers is now a pervasive part of modem computing, and occurs in all sorts of contexts including business, education, and personal computer use. In addition, such uses by all current predictions appear to be even more desirable in the future. Video on demand (“VOD”) is one area which has for some time driven the advancement of technology in this area. More recently, the rapid increase in use and popularity of the Global Internet (hereafter, the “Internet”) has perhaps surpassed the excitement created by VOD. This Internet focus also has further motivated research and preliminary development of systems directed to advanced communication of information between remotely located computers. These factors as well as the continuing evolution of computer information exchange gives rise to the present embodiments.
One type of technology arising from the above and continuing to evolve is referred to in the art as digital subscriber line (“DSL”). DSL is a public network technology that delivers relatively high bandwidth over conventional telephone company copper wiring at limited distances. As explored below, DSL has been further separated into several different categories. All of these differing DSL categories are currently developing, some at different rates than others. In any event, the evolution prevents an absolute definition of any specific DSL category, but some observations may be made at the current time and are explored below.
Given the various DSL technology categories, it may be stated that each differs in some respects while each also shares some similarities. As to differences of the DSL categories, they may diverge in one or more of the expected data transfer rate, the medium type and length over which data are communicated, and the scheme for encoding and decoding data for communication. As to the similarities of the DSL technologies, generally speaking each DSL system is provisioned into modem pairs. One modem of the modem pair is located at a customer site. The other modem of the modem pair is located at the site of an owner, or controller, of a twisted conductor pair network. Currently, the most evident owner or controller is a telephone company central office. Within the telephone company system, its modem is connected to communicate with some type of network, often referred to as a backbone network. The backbone network is further coupled in a network manner to provide other communication paths to and from the backbone network. These other paths are often accomplished through the use of routers, and more recently it has been proposed to eliminate routers in favor of a hardware device referred to as a digital subscriber line access multiplexer (“DSLAM”). In any event, given its network nature, the backbone network may further communicate with other information sources and, most notably under current technology, with the Internet Thus, information accessible to the backbone network, such as Internet information, may be communicated between the central office DSL modem and a customer site with its own compatible DSL modem. Within this general system, it is also anticipated that data rates between DSL modems may be far greater than current voice modem rates. Indeed, current DSL systems being tested or projected range in rates on the order of 500 Kbps to 18 Mbps, or even faster. As explored briefly below, however, note that the higher rates for some DSL systems are only for so-called downstream communications, that is, from the central office to the customer site; thus, for those systems, communication in the other direction (i.e., upstream from the customer site to the central office) is generally at a rate considerably lower than the downstream rate. Lastly, note that most DSL technologies do not use the whole bandwidth of the twisted pair and, thus, often reserve low bandwidth for a voice channel. As a result, while a line is being used by a DSL system, the same line may concurrently communicate a voice conversation as well.
Briefly looking at perhaps the most publicized DSL technology currently being developed, it is referred to as Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line, or “ADSL.” ADSL has been standardized by ANSI as seen by its T1.413 standard. However, even given that standard, there continues to be debate and competition as to whether devices complying with the standard provide promise for future wide scale use, and indeed whether the standard requires revision. For example, the standard currently contemplates a modulation technology called Discrete Multitone (DMT) for the transmission of high speed data, but more recently it has been urged that the standard further include an alternative data transmission technique referred to as carrierless amplitude/phase modulation (CAP). In any event, given the state of the art discussion of ADSL systems, it is contemplated that they will communicate over a single copper twisted pair, and provide downstream rates on the order of 1.5 Mbps to 9 Mbps, while upstream bandwidth will range from 16 kbps to 640 kbps. Along with Internet access, telephone companies are considering delivering remote local area network (“LAN”) access and VOD services via ADSL.
As to other DSL categories being developed, they include High-Bit-Rate Digital Subscriber Line (“HDSL”), Single-Line Digital Subscriber Line (“SDSL”), and Very-high-data-rate Digital Subscriber Line (“VDSL”). HDSL, unlike ADSL as described above, has a symmetric data transfer rate, that is, it communicates at the same speed in both the upstream and downstream directions. Current perceived speeds are on the order of 1.544 Mbps of bandwidth, but require two copper twisted pairs. HDSL's operating range is more limited than that of ADSL, and is currently considered to be effective at distances of approximately 12,000 feet Beyond sudi a distance, HDSL communication requires signal repeaters to extend the service. SDSL delivers a comparable speed and also a symmetric data transfer as compared to HDSL, but achieves these results with a single copper twisted pair. However, the operating range of an SDSL system is limited to approximately 10,000 feet. Lastly, VDSL provides asymmetric data transfer rates, but anticipates much higher speeds than those competing DSL technologies described above. Currently, rates over a single twisted copper pair on the order of 13 Mbps to 52 Mpbs downstream, and 1.5 Mbps to 2.3 Mbps upstream, are contemplated. Note, however, that such rates are expected to operate only over a range of 1,000 to 4,500 feet.
Despite the many variations of DSL technology as introduced above, it has been recognized in connection with the inventive embodiments described below that many of the prior art approaches provide various drawbacks. For example, many of the attempted implementations for current DSL technologies are heavily constrained in hardware. More specifically, often these implementations are achieved through an application specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) or more than one ASIC. Thus, if a standard has not yet been announced, or if a standard changes as may be the case even for those standards currently in place, the ASIC may be rendered useless if it will not accommodate the new or changed standard. As another example, there is a need for DSL technologies to be easily and readily compatible with existing personal computer and workstation architectures and operating environments. As another example, many of the contemplated systems require considerable complexity for implementation. Such complexity may provide numerous drawbacks. For example, complexity may slow the implementation and continuing development of the technology. As another and perhaps most important example for a technology having such broad potential dis
Lu Xiaolin
Mannering Dennis G.
Brady III W. James
Corrielus Jean
Moore J. Dennis
Telecky , Jr. Frederick J.
Texas Instruments Incorporated
LandOfFree
Digital subscriber line device driver using communication... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Digital subscriber line device driver using communication..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Digital subscriber line device driver using communication... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2973867