Surgery – Radioactive substance applied to body for therapy – Radioactive substance placed within body
Reexamination Certificate
1999-08-24
2002-10-01
Gilbert, Samuel G. (Department: 3736)
Surgery
Radioactive substance applied to body for therapy
Radioactive substance placed within body
Reexamination Certificate
active
06458069
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to catheters used to deliver radiation to prevent or slow restenosis of an artery traumatized such as by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
PTA treatment of the coronary arteries, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), also known as balloon angioplasty, is the predominant treatment for coronary vessel stenosis. Approximately 300,000 procedures were performed in the United States in 1990 and nearly one million procedures worldwide in 1997. The U.S. market constitutes roughly half of the total market for this procedure. The increasing popularity of the PTCA procedure is attributable to its relatively high success rate, and its minimal invasiveness compared with coronary by-pass surgery. Patients treated by PTCA, however, suffer from a high incidence of restenosis, with about 35% or more of all patients requiring repeat PTCA procedures or by-pass surgery, with attendant high cost and added patient risk.
Recent attempts to prevent restenosis by use of drugs, mechanical devices, and other experimental procedures have had limited long term success. Stents, for example, dramatically reduce acute reclosure, and slow the clinical effects of smooth muscle cell proliferation by enlarging the minimum luminal diameter, but otherwise do nothing to prevent the proliferative response to the angioplasty induced injury.
Restenosis is now believed to occur at least in part as a result of injury to the arterial wall during the lumen opening angioplasty procedure. In some patients, the injury initiates a repair response that is characterized by hyperplastic growth of vascular cells in the region traumatized by the angioplasty which is termed neointimal hyperplasia. Neointimal hyperplasia narrows the lumen that was opened by the angioplasty, regardless of the presence of a stent, thereby necessitating a repeat PTCA or other procedure to alleviate the restenosis.
Preliminary studies indicate that intravascular radiotherapy (IVRT) has promise in the prevention or long-term control of restenosis following angioplasty. IVRT may also be used to prevent or delay stenosis following cardiovascular graft procedures or other trauma to the vessel wall. Proper control of the radiation dosage, however, appears to be important to inhibit or arrest hyperplasia without causing excessive damage to healthy tissue. Overdosing of a section of blood vessel can cause arterial necrosis, inflammation, hemorrhaging, and other risks discussed below. Underdosing will result in inadequate inhibition of smooth muscle cell hyperplasia, or even exacerbation of hyperplasia and resulting restenosis.
The prior art contains many examples of catheter based radiation delivery systems. The simplest systems disclose seed train type sources inside closed end tubes. An example of this type of system can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,199,939 to Dake. In order to separate the radiation source from the catheter and allow re-use of the source, a delivery system is disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,345 to Waksman et al. where radioactive source seeds are hydraulically driven into the lumen of a closed end catheter where they remain for the duration of the treatment, after which they are pumped back into the container. Later disclosures integrated the source wire into catheters more like the type common in interventional cardiology. In this type of device, a closed end lumen, through which is deployed a radioactive source wire, is added to a conventional catheter construction. A balloon is incorporated to help center the source wire in the lumen. It is supposed that the radioactive source wire would be delivered through the catheter with a commercial type afterloader system produced by a manufacturer such as Nucletron, BV. These types of systems are disclosed in Liprie U.S. Pat. No. 5,618,266, Weinberger U.S. Pat. No. 5,503,613, and Bradshaw U.S. Pat. No. 5,662,580.
In the systems disclosed by Dake and Waksman, the source resides in or very near the center of the catheter during treatment. However, it does not necessarily reside in the center of the artery. The systems disclosed by Weinberger and Bradshaw further include a centering mechanism, such as an inflatable balloon, to overcome this shortcoming. In either case, the source activity and energy must be high enough to overcome absorption loss encountered as the particles traverse the lumen of the blood vessel to get to the target tissue site in the vessel wall. Higher activity and energy sources, however, can have undesirable consequences. First, the likelihood of radiation inadvertently affecting untargeted tissue is higher because the absorption factor per unit tissue length is lower. Second, the higher activity and energy sources are more hazardous to the medical staff and thus require additional shielding during storage and additional precaution during use. In addition, the source of any activity or energy may or may not be exactly in the center of the lumen, so the dose calculations are subject to error factors due to non-uniformity in the radial distance from the source surface to the target tissue. The impact of these factors is a common topic of discussion at recent medical conferences addressing Intravascular Radiation Therapy, such as the Trans Catheter Therapeutics conference, the Scripps Symposium on Radiotherapy, the Advances in Cardiovascular Radiation Therapy meeting, the American College of Cardiology meeting, and the American Heart Association Meeting.
The impact on treatment strategy is discussed in detail in a paper discussing a removable seed system similar to the ones disclosed above (Tierstein et al., Catheter based Radiotherapy to Inhibit Restenosis after Coronary Stenting, NEJM 1997; 336(24):1697-1703). Tierstein reports that Scripps Clinic physicians inspect each vessel using ultrasonography to assess the maximum and minimum distances from the source center to the target tissue. To prevent a dose hazard, they will not treat vessels where more than about a 4× differential dose factor (8-30 Gy) exists between the near vessel target and the far vessel target. Differential dose factors such as these are inevitable for a catheter in a curvilinear vessel such as an artery, and will invariably limit the use of radiation and add complexity to the procedure. Moreover, the paper describes the need to keep the source in a lead transport device called a “pig”, as well as the fact that the medical staff leaves the catheterization procedure room during the treatment. Thus added complexity, time and risk is added to the procedure caused by variability of the position of the source within the delivery system and by the activity and energy of the source itself.
In response to these dosimetry problems, several more inventions have been disclosed in an attempt to overcome the limitations of the high energy seed based systems. These systems share a common feature in that they attempt to bring the source closer to the target tissue. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,168 to Hess teaches the use of a radioactive source contained in a flexible carrier with remotely manipulated windows; Fearnot discloses a wire basket construction in U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,384 that can be introduced in a low profile state and then deployed once in place; Hess also purports to disclose a balloon with radioactive sources attached on the surface in U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,168; Hehrlein discloses a balloon catheter coated with an active isotope in WO 96/22121; and Bradshaw discloses a balloon catheter adapted for use with a liquid isotope in U.S. Pat. No. 5,662,580. The purpose of all of these inventions is to place the source closer to the target tissue, thus improving the treatment characteristics of dosimetry.
In a non-catheter based approach, U.S. Pat. No. 5,059,166 to Fischell discloses an IVRT method that relies on a radioactive stent that is permanently implanted in the blood vessel after completion of the lumen opening procedure. Close control of the radiation dose delivered to the patient by means of a perma
Tam Lisa A.
Trauthen Brett A.
Endology, INC.
Gilbert Samuel G.
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
LandOfFree
Multi layer radiation delivery balloon does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Multi layer radiation delivery balloon, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Multi layer radiation delivery balloon will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2971198