Internal-combustion engines – Combustion chamber means having fuel injection only – Using multiple injectors or injections
Reexamination Certificate
2001-09-24
2002-12-10
Wolfe, Willis R. (Department: 3747)
Internal-combustion engines
Combustion chamber means having fuel injection only
Using multiple injectors or injections
C123S295000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06491018
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates generally to electronically controlled fuel injection systems and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for delivering multiple fuel injections to the cylinder of an internal combustion engine during a fuel injection event based upon engine operating conditions.
BACKGROUND ART
Electronically controlled fuel injectors are well known in the art including both hydraulically actuated electronically controlled fuel injectors as well as mechanically actuated electronically controlled fuel injectors. Electronically controlled fuel injectors typically inject fuel into a specific engine cylinder as a function of an injection signal received from an electronic controller. These signals include waveforms that are indicative of a desired injection rate as well as the desired timing and quantity of fuel to be injected into the cylinders.
Emission regulations pertaining to engine exhaust emissions are becoming more restrictive throughout the world including, for example, restrictions on the emission of hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, the release of particulates, and the release of nitrogen oxides (NO
x
). Tailoring the number of injections and the injection rate of fuel to a combustion chamber, as well as the quantity and timing of such fuel injections, is one way in which to control emissions and meet such emission standards. As a result, split fuel injection techniques have been utilized to modify the burn characteristics of the combustion process in an attempt to reduce emission and noise levels. Split injection typically involves splitting the total fuel delivery to the cylinder during a particular injection event into two separate fuel injections such as a pilot injection and a main injection. At different engine operating conditions, it may be necessary to use different injection strategies in order to achieve both desired engine operation and emissions control. As used throughout this disclosure, an injection event is defined as the injections that occur in a cylinder during one cycle of the engine. For example, one cycle of a four cycle engine for a particular cylinder, includes an intake, compression, expansion, and exhaust stroke. Therefore, the injection event in a four stroke engine includes the number of injections, or shots, that occur in a cylinder during the four strokes of the piston. The term shot as used in the art may also refer to the actual fuel injection or to the command current signal to a fuel injector or other fuel actuation device indicative of an injection or delivery of fuel to the engine.
In the past, the controllability of split injections has been somewhat restricted by mechanical and other limitations associated with the particular types of injectors utilized. In addition, in some embodiments, such as disclosed in the patent U.S. Pat. No. 5,740,775, the total fuel quantity associated with a split injection is apportioned such that approximately 50% of the fuel is associated with the first fuel shot and approximately 50% of the fuel is associated with the second-fuel shot. Under the more restrictive emissions regulations of today, this fuel partitioning strategy yields higher than desirable hydrocarbons and excessive fuel dilution of the oil. Even with more advanced electronically controlled injectors, during certain engine operating conditions, it is sometimes difficult to accurately control fuel delivery, even when utilizing current control signals.
In addition, some spark ignited engines incorporate split injection fuel strategies, such as disclosed in the patent U.S. Pat. No. 5,609,131. However, in order to achieve desired ignition timing utilizing a spark or glow plug, these engines are restricted in the manner of fuel distribution among the shots, thereby reducing their effectiveness with regard to reducing engine emissions.
Desired engine performance is not always achieved at all engine speeds and engine load conditions using the previously known fuel injection strategies. Based upon engine operating conditions, the injection timing, fuel flow rate and the injected fuel volume are desirably optimized in order to achieve minimum emissions and desired fuel consumption. This is not always achieved in a split injection system due to a variety of reasons, including limitations on the different types of achievable injection waveform types, the amount of fuel injected during the pilot shot, when the two injections take place during the particular injection event, and the timing sequence between the two injections. As a result, problems such as injecting fuel at a rate or time other than desired within a given injection event and/or allowing fuel to be injected beyond a desired stopping point can adversely affect emission outputs and fuel economy.
It is therefore desirable to control and deliver any number of separate fuel injections to a particular cylinder including three or more fuel shots so as to minimize emissions and fuel consumption based upon the operating conditions of the engine at that particular point in time. This may include splitting the fuel injection into more than two separate fuel shots during a particular injection event, providing a specific fuel quantity relationship between the respective fuel shots in a particular injection event based upon the number of fuel shots associated therewith, advancing the pilot shot during the compression stroke, delivering the respective fuel shots within defined crank angle or cylinder piston displacement limits, and adjusting the timing between the various multiple fuel injections in order to achieve desired emissions and fuel consumption. In some situations, it is also desirable to rate shape the front end of the fuel delivery to the cylinder to control the burn characteristics of the particular fuel being utilized and, in other situations, it may be desirable to rate shape the tail end of the fuel delivery to the cylinder to achieve desired emissions control and engine performance.
Accordingly, the present invention is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems as set forth above.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect of the present invention there is disclosed an electronically controlled fuel injection system which is capable of delivering multiple fuel injections to a particular cylinder of an internal combustion engine during a single injection event. The present system includes means for variably providing multiple separate fuel injections or fuel shots during a fuel injection event depending upon the operating conditions of the engine including engine speed and engine load. In this regard, in one embodiment, fuel is apportioned between a first or pilot shot, a second or main shot, and a third or anchor shot, each separate fuel injection shot being delivered when the cylinder piston is located within a determined range during a particular piston stroke. In another embodiment, fuel is apportioned between the multiple fuel shots in accordance with a specific fuel quantity relationship. The present system also includes means for varying the timing and fuel quantity associated with each fuel injection as well as the time interval between the various fuel injection shots based upon the operating conditions of the engine.
Under certain operating conditions, the proximity of the main and anchor shots and the resultant internal injector hydraulics leads to a rate shaping effect of the third or anchor injection. As a result, although the first or pilot injection, when used, is typically a distinct injection as compared to the second and third injections, a distinct third injection is not always apparent. Depending upon such factors as ambient operating conditions, engine speed, engine load, desired engine performance, desired emissions, and still other factors, in certain situations, a split mode of operation between the second and third injections may be advantageous whereas in other situations a rate shaping effect or boot mode of operation between the second and third injections may be advantageous.
These and other aspects and advantages of the
Duffy Kevin P.
Fluga Eric C.
Hafner Gregory G.
McGee Brian G.
Roth Matthew R.
Caterpillar Inc
Gimie Mahmoud
Wolfe Willis R.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for delivering multiple fuel injections... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for delivering multiple fuel injections..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for delivering multiple fuel injections... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2956375