Data processing: structural design – modeling – simulation – and em – Simulating nonelectrical device or system – Mechanical
Reexamination Certificate
1998-02-04
2002-10-22
Choi, Kyle J. (Department: 2163)
Data processing: structural design, modeling, simulation, and em
Simulating nonelectrical device or system
Mechanical
C702S033000, C345S215000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06470303
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to electronic systems and more particularly relates to a system and method for acquiring and uniformly quantifying vehicular damage information.
2. Description of the Related Art
Vehicular accidents are a common occurrence in many parts of the world and, unfortunately, vehicular accidents, even at low impact and separation velocities, are often accompanied by injury to vehicle occupants. It is often desirable to reconcile actual occupant injury reports to a potential for energy based on vehicular accident information. Trained engineers and accident reconstruction experts evaluate subject vehicles involved in a collision, and based on their training and experience, may be able to arrive at an estimated change in velocity (“&Dgr;V”) for each the subject vehicles. The potential for injury can be derived from knowledge of the respective &Dgr;V's for the subject vehicles.
However, involving trained engineers and accident reconstruction experts in all collisions, especially in the numerous low velocity collisions, is often not cost effective.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one embodiment of the present invention, a computer system is utilized to provide a graphical user interface which allows nontechnical personnel to acquire vehicular damage information for use by the computer system. The damage information may take a variety of forms including component repair estimates, component replacement information, and visual damage observation. Thus, to facilitate vehicular damage entry, the graphical user interface facilitates entry of damage based on individual components. Individual component damage entry is well suited to the abilities of nontechnical personnel. The graphical user interface also, for example, facilitates entry of three dimensional vehicle crush damage using two dimensional generated displays. The computer system utilizes the acquired damage information to generate a likely &Dgr;V for each of the subject vehicles in an accident. Generating a likely &Dgr;V for each subject vehicle in the collision includes, for example, comparing the acquired subject vehicle damage information with information available from vehicular crash tests. To validate such comparisons, test and subject vehicle damage ratings are generated based on a uniform quantification of component-by-component damage.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a computer program product, encoded in computer readable media, includes first instructions, executable by a processor, for displaying a vehicle image corresponding to an actual vehicle, the vehicle image having selectable grid locations displayed over a portion of the vehicle image, second instructions, executable by the processor, for receiving grid selection input information to indicate vehicle damaged portions, and third instructions, executable by the processor, for receiving depth information corresponding to the indicated vehicle damaged portions.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a computer system includes a display device, a processor coupled to the display device, computer readable medium coupled to the processor, and computer code, encoded in the computer readable medium, for generating a graphical user interface, wherein the graphical user interface includes a first screen object representing a vehicle having selectable portions to indicate damage areas, a second screen object representing crush depth regions corresponding to the selectable damage area portions of the vehicle, and a third screen object to allow entry of crush depth information. In a further embodiment of the present invention, the computer system further includes third computer code, encoded in the computer readable medium and executable by the processor, to rate damage severity of each vehicle component according to a set of predetermined rules, fourth computer code, encoded in the computer readable medium and executable by the processor, to determine an overall damage rating for the vehicle based on rated damage to the vehicle components, and fifth computer code, encoded in the computer readable medium and executable by the processor, to compare the overall damage rating for the vehicle to a crash test vehicle having an overall rating based on component damage ratings in accordance with the set of rules.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4435769 (1984-03-01), Nagano et al.
patent: 5128859 (1992-07-01), Carbone et al.
patent: 5317503 (1994-05-01), Inoue
patent: 5377098 (1994-12-01), Sakai
patent: 5432904 (1995-07-01), Wong
patent: 5469628 (1995-11-01), Chartrand
patent: 5504674 (1996-04-01), Chen et al.
patent: 5657233 (1997-08-01), Cherrington et al.
patent: 5657460 (1997-08-01), Egan et al.
patent: 5839112 (1998-11-01), Schreitmueller et al.
patent: 5950169 (1999-09-01), Borghesi et al.
patent: 6052631 (2000-04-01), Busch et al.
patent: 0 644 501 (1994-09-01), None
“Use of Biomechanics to Respond to Low Impact Soft Tissue Cases,” Nebraska Department of Insurance Newsletter, vol. 1-Spring 1998 (Fraud Division).*
WREXPERT—product review, Biodynamics Corporation, [retrieved on Apr. 26, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.biodynamicresearch/wrexpert.htm>.*
Haggerty, A. “German Auto Repair Test Helps Control Insurance Rates” National Underwriter, vol. 94, No. 15, Apr. 9, 1990, start p. 46 (2).*
Nilsson-Ehle, A. (1983), ‘Energy-based determination of velocity change in traffic accidents’,Int. J. of Vehicle Design, vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 126-135.
Brach, Raymond M., ‘Least Squares Collision Reconstruction’, Detroit, MI, Engl, 1987, pp. 31-40.
Grimes, Wesley D. et al., ‘Developing a Crush Profile Estimate by Balancing Impact Forces’, Proceedings of the 1997 International Congress And Exposition, Detroit, MI, USA, Feb. 24-27, 1997, pp. 1-20.
Prasad, Aloke K., ‘Coefficient of Restitution of Vehicle Structures and Its Use in Estimating the Total Delta V in Automobile Collisions’, Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers; Atlanta, GA, USA, Dec. 1-6, 1991, pp. 217-246.
McHenry and McHenry, “A Revised Damage Analysis Procedure for the CRASH Computer Program,”Thirtieth Stapp Car Crash Conference Proceedings P-189, Oct. 1986, pp 333-344. SAE #861894.
Siegmund, Bailey and King, “Characteristics of Specific Automobile Bumpers in Low-Velocity Impacts,”Accident Reconstruction: Technology and Animation SP-1030, Feb. 1994, pp 333-370. SAE #940916.
King, Siegmund and Bailey, “Automobile Bumper Behavior in Low-Speed Impacts,”International Congress and Exposition Detroit, Michigan, Mar. 1993. SAE #930211.
Bailey, Wong and Lawrence, “Data and Methods for Estimating the Severity of Minor Impacts,”Accident Reconstruction: Technology and Animation V SP-1083, Feb. 1995, pp 139-175. SAE #950352.
Hight and Fugger, “Automobile Damage Scales and the Effect on Injury Analysis,”Accident Reconstruction: Technology and Animation II SP-907, Feb. 1992, pp 117-127. SAE #920602.
Woolley, Strother and James, “Rear Stiffness Coefficients Derived from Barrier Test Data,”Accident Reconstruction: Technology and Animation SP853, Feb. 1991, pp 9-24. SAE #910120.
Prasad, “CRASH3 Damage Algorithm Reformulation for Front and Rear Collisions,”Accident Reconstruction: Human, Vehicle and Environmental Factors SP-814, Feb. 1990, pp 1-10. SAE #900098.
Bailey, King, Romilly and Thomson, “Characterization of Automotive Bumper Components for Low Speed Impacts,”Proceedings of the Canadian Multidisciplinary Road Safety Conference VII, Jun. 1991, pp 190-203.
Howard, Bomar and Bare, “Vehicle Restitution Response in Low Velocity Collisions,”1993 SAE Future Transportation Technology Conference San Antonio, Texas, Aug. 1993, pp 1-10. SAE #931842.
Robinette, Fay and Paulsen, “Delta-V: Basic Concepts, Computational Methods, and Misunderstandings,”Accident Reconstruction: Technology and Animation IV SP-1030, Feb. 1994, pp 309-332. SAE #940915.
Campbell, “Energy Basis for Collision Severity,” 1974. SAE #740565.
Strother, Woolley and James, “A Comparison Between NHTSA
Bomar, Jr. John B.
Kidd Scott D.
Pancratz David J.
Rogers Linda J.
Smith Darrin A.
Choi Kyle J.
Injury Sciences LLC
Trop Pruner & Hu P.C.
LandOfFree
System and method for acquiring and quantifying vehicular... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System and method for acquiring and quantifying vehicular..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method for acquiring and quantifying vehicular... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2924445