Ceramic to metal joint assembly

Joints and connections – Utilizing thermal characteristic – e.g. – expansion or... – Interposed material of intermediate coefficient of expansion

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C403S030000, C403S273000, C416S24400R

Reexamination Certificate

active

06431781

ABSTRACT:

TECHNICAL FIELD
this invention relates generally to gas turbine engines and in particular to a joint assembly for coupling a ceramic member to a metal member.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It has long been recognized that the efficiency and performance of gas turbine engines could be improved by increasing the temperature of the gas through the turbine section. Historically, these temperatures have been limited by the materials, usually high temperature steel or nickel alloy, used in forming the turbine rotor. To permit higher gas temperatures it has been proposed to form the turbine rotor from a high density, high strength, silicon nitride, or silicon carbide ceramic which can withstand higher temperatures than steels or nickel alloys.
The ceramic turbine rotor extract energy from the hot gas in the engine and converts it into torque. To transmit this torque to other components of the engine and thereby cause them to rotate, the ceramic turbine rotor needs to be couple to a superalloy or metal component of the engine such as the compressor rotor. Because monolithic ceramic has a higher compressive strength in comparison to its tensile strength, it is advantageous to use an interference fit type joint to couple the turbine rotor to the compressor rotor. Typically, this joint is comprised of a metal sleeve pressed on to a shaft portion of the ceramic turbine rotor with the metal sleeve applying a compressive load to the ceramic shaft portion. A disadvantage to this type of joint is that due to the thermal expansion mismatch between the metal and ceramic, a conventional interference fit loses it torque transmitting capability at temperatures in the range of 400 to 500° depending on the specific metal and ceramic chosen and the magnitude of the interference fit.
Accordingly, there is a need for a joint assembly for coupling a ceramic member to a metal member that is capable of transmitting torque at temperatures greater than 500° C.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide a joint assembly for coupling a ceramic member to a metal member that is capable of transmitting torque at temperatures greater than 500°C.
The present invention achieves this objective by providing a joint assembly for coupling a ceramic member to a metal member that is comprised of a ceramic shaft portion attached to the ceramic member; a slotted shrink fitter formed of a first metal and disposed around and in torque transmitting contact with the ceramic shaft portion to define a first interface surface therebetween; and a sleeve formed of a second metal disposed around and in torque transmitting contact with the shrink fitter to define a second interface surface therebetween. Either the shrink fifter or the sleeve attached to the metal member. The coefficient of thermal expansion of the second metal is relatively low compared to that of the first metal and the diameters of the first interface, (d
1
), and the second interface, (d
2
), are determined from the equation, d
1
/d
2
=(&agr;
c
−&agr;
1
)/(&agr;
2
−&agr;
1
) where &agr;
c
, &agr;
1
and &agr;
2
are the coefficients of thermal expansion of the ceramic, the first metal and the second metal respectively.
By selecting the appropriate metals and interface diameters, the contact pressure, which is directly related to torque transmitting capability, between the ceramic to metal interface will remain essentially constant even at temperature above 500° C.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention, are specifically set forth in, or will become apparent from, the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.


REFERENCES:
patent: 2443688 (1948-06-01), McFarland
patent: 3019039 (1962-01-01), Clavell
patent: 4147468 (1979-04-01), Murakami et al.
patent: 4281941 (1981-08-01), Rottenkolber
patent: 4325647 (1982-04-01), Maier et al.
patent: 4417855 (1983-11-01), Jepsen
patent: 4610934 (1986-09-01), Boecker et al.
patent: 4722630 (1988-02-01), Fang
patent: 4772139 (1988-09-01), Bretton
patent: 4798493 (1989-01-01), Oda et al.
patent: 4836750 (1989-06-01), Modafferi et al.
patent: 4886695 (1989-12-01), Mizuno et al.
patent: 4908256 (1990-03-01), Oda et al.
patent: 4915589 (1990-04-01), Gessler et al.
patent: 4984927 (1991-01-01), Kojima et al.
patent: 5020932 (1991-06-01), Boyd
patent: 5066547 (1991-11-01), Ishida et al.
patent: 5108025 (1992-04-01), Kang et al.
patent: 5279211 (1994-01-01), Bentz et al.
patent: 5435234 (1995-07-01), Bentz et al.
patent: 5747428 (1998-05-01), Khorramian
patent: 6270318 (2001-08-01), Shah et al.
patent: 58-178803 (1983-10-01), None
patent: 58-217702 (1983-12-01), None
patent: 58-220901 (1983-12-01), None
patent: 61-008410 (1986-01-01), None

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Ceramic to metal joint assembly does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Ceramic to metal joint assembly, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Ceramic to metal joint assembly will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2886620

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.