Electrostatic discharge protection clamp for high-voltage...

Electricity: electrical systems and devices – Safety and protection of systems and devices – Transient responsive

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C361S091100, C361S118000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06356427

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A typical integrated circuit (IC) includes an IC package and a semiconductor device that is physically and electrically connected within the IC package. The semiconductor device typically includes electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection devices that protect the semiconductor device against ESD events that would otherwise cause damage. Generally, the ESD protection devices are located within the semiconductor device in close proximity to semiconductor device pads, which electrically connect to pins of the IC package.
One conventional ESD protection device provides an ESD clamp (or shunt) between the semiconductor pad to be protected and a reference conductor (i.e., a ground conductor). If power is disconnected (e.g., when the semiconductor device is being handled prior to its installation within an IC package, or when an assembled IC is being handled prior to its installation on a circuit board), the ESD protection device shunts or clamps any positive charge on the pad that is above a particular threshold to the reference conductor. If the power is on (e.g., when the assembled IC is installed on a circuit board and is operational), the ESD protection device is deactivated and an signal on the pad is permitted to pass through to other semiconductor device circuitry, i.e., internal circuits of device. An example of such an ESD protection device is described in U.S. application Ser. No. 08/979,376, entitled “Cross-Referenced Electrostatic Discharge Protection Systems and Methods for Power Supplies,” filed Nov. 26, 1997, the entire teachings of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
Due to improvements in semiconductor technology, manufacturers can now make transistors smaller thereby reducing semiconductor size and power consumption. The decrease in transistor size has been accompanied by a decrease in transistor voltage tolerance, which is the voltage that can be applied safely across any two terminals of each transistor of the semiconductor device without causing thin oxide damage in the context of MOS-type devices, for example. This maximum tolerable voltage for the transistors is commonly referred to as the rated or process technology voltage. For example, older semiconductor devices were built using a 5V process technology where each transistor could tolerate an operating voltage of 5 Volts (V) across any two terminals without sustaining thin oxide damage. More recently, semiconductor devices have been built using a 3.3V process technology. In such devices, the voltage across any two terminals of each transistor must be less than 3.3V in order to avoid causing thin oxide damage. Presently, manufacturers are implementing 2.5V and 1.5V process technology, and such improvements in semiconductor technology are expected to continue.
Occasionally, manufacturers combine IC's having different semiconductor technologies on the same circuit board or in the same system. For example, a manufacturer may mix some IC's having semiconductor devices built using a 5V process technology with other IC's having semiconductor devices built using a 3.3V process technology in order to obtain some of the benefits of using 3.3V process IC's (e.g., smaller packaging, lower power consumption, greater speed, lower cost). For this an IC containing a semiconductor device using a 3.3V process technology must often be designed to interface with IC's containing semiconductor devices built using a 5V process technology. Specifically, the 3.3V IC must drive and receive signals at the logic levels expected by the 5V IC's in the system. To accomplish this, the 3.3V IC often requires a 5V power supply to power the 3.3V IC's I/O stages. Therefore, the 3.3V IC contains a mixture of 3.3V and 5V circuits.
Providing ESD protection in a mixed voltage IC tends to complicate the design of the ESD clamp and its control circuit. For example, one known semiconductor device includes a cantilevered ESD clamp and an RC-timed control circuit, which is interconnected between the power supply pad and the ESD clamp, to control deactivation of the ESD clamp. When power is off, the RC-timed circuit maintains ESD clamp in a conductive state for a time period related to the circuit's time constant. This allows the shunting of a short ESD event from the pad to a reference conductor. In contrast, when power is on, the RC-timed circuit operates as a voltage divider to divide a 5 V power supply signal down to a 3.6 V signal, which is used to disable the ESD clamp. Without the reduction in voltage from 5 V to 3.6 V, one or more components of the ESD clamp would be very susceptible to thin oxide damage. An example of such a circuit (hereinafter referred to as the “cantilevered circuit”) is described in an article entitled “Protection of High Voltage Power and Programming Pins,” by Maloney et al., EOS/ESD Symposium 97-246, (1997).
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
While having certain advantages relative to its prior art, the cantilevered circuit does suffer from certain performance problems. In particular, the cantilevered circuit is not well-suited for situations where it is desirable to disable ESD protection using a signal that is independent of the signal received on the ESD protected pad. For example, in the above-described cantilevered circuit, the 3.6 V power supply signal that disables the ESD clamp is derived from the 5 V power supply signal received on the protected pad. The 3.6 V power supply signal is not independent of the 5 V power supply signal. Additionally, the RC-timed deactivation feature of the cantilevered circuit may result in inadequate ESD protection against prolonged ESD events, which are on the order of the time constant of the circuit. Furthermore, when the RC-timed circuit operates as a voltage divider during normal operation, the RC-timed circuit generates a leakage current that increases IC power consumption.
The present invention is directed to a technique for protecting a semiconductor device against ESD events that uses a control voltage that is independent of the pad being protected. The ESD stage provides a conducting path between the pad and a reference conductor. In particular, the technique involves providing protection for a high-voltage pad of a semiconductor device. The pad is high-voltage in the sense that it is designed to receive a voltage, during operation, that is greater than a rated or process voltage for the device. A control signal that is used to signal ESD events is derived from an independent pad, which is also high voltage.
In general, according to one aspect, the invention features an electrostatic discharge protection circuit for a protected, high-voltage pad of a semiconductor device to protect its internal circuits from electrostatic discharge. The protected high-voltage pad receives voltages during the operation of the internal circuits that are greater than a rated voltage of the semiconductor device. The protection circuit comprises a clamp stage, comprising at least two cascode-connected transistor clamps between the protected high-voltage pad and a reference conductor. The clamp stage sinks electrostatic charge from the protected high-voltage pad to a reference conductor and away from the internal circuits. A control stage activates the clamp stage to couple electrostatic charge from the protected high-voltage pad and deactivates the clamp stage when the internal circuits are operational by reference to a control signal, which is derived from an independent high-voltage pad. The control stage further reduces a magnitude of the control signal for at least one of the transistor clamps to less than a rated voltage of the semiconductor device.
In specific embodiments, two inverter amplifiers are used to activate and deactivate the transistor clamps. The voltage of the control signal is reduced at the amplifiers to avoid thin-oxide damage.
The above and other features of the invention including various novel details of construction and combinations of parts, and other advantages, will now be more particularly descr

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Electrostatic discharge protection clamp for high-voltage... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Electrostatic discharge protection clamp for high-voltage..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electrostatic discharge protection clamp for high-voltage... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2851853

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.