Method for determining the kinematic state of an object, by...

Communications: directive radio wave systems and devices (e.g. – Determining velocity – Combined with determining distance and direction

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C342S106000, C342S139000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07928898

ABSTRACT:
In a method for determining the kinematic state of an object by evaluating a sequence of discrete polar measured values of a sensor, the polar measurements rm, αmare converted to Cartesian coordinates and subsequently scaled to Cartesian pseudo-measurements using a scaling factor β calculated as a function of measured range rm. Associated pseudo-measurement error variance matrices are determined, each comprising nominal measurement error variances in the range direction R2mand transversely thereto C2mas a function of the measured range rm. The state of the object is estimated, with an estimated variance {circumflex over (σ)}2crossbeing determined transversely with respect to the range direction in an estimation device, based on the Cartesian pseudo-measurements and the pseudo-measurement error variance matrices. The scaling factor β is chosen such that no systematic error results for a position estimate comprising n>1 measurements; and the nominal pseudo-measurement error variance R2min the range direction is calculated as a function of the nominal pseudo-measurement error variance C2mtransversely thereto or conversely such that the variance {circumflex over (σ)}2crosswhich is estimated after processing of n>1 measurements, transversely with respect to the range direction, on average matches the actual variance {circumflex over (σ)}2crossof the estimated error transversely with respect to the range direction.

REFERENCES:
Longbin, M. et al., “Unbiased Converted Measurements for Tracking”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Jul. 1, 1998, pp. 1023-1027, No. 3.
International Search Report dated Jun. 12, 2009 with partial English translation (Six (6) pages).
Longbin, M. et al., “Unbiased Converted Measurements for Tracking”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Jul. 1, 1998, pp. 1023-1027, No. 3, XP009100946, ISSN:0018-9251.
Longbin, M. et al, “Unbiased Converted Measurements for Target Tracking”, Aerospace and Electronics Conference, Proceedings of the IEEE, 1997, pp. 1039-1041, USA, XP010242950 ISBN: 978-0-7803-3725-1.
Yeom, S-W., “Improving Track Continuity Using Track Segment Association” , Aerospace Conference, IEEE, Mar. 8-15, 2003, pp. 1925-1941, vol. 4, USA XP010660418, ISBN: 978-0-7803-7651-9.
Miller, M. D. et al, “Comparison of Methodologies for Mitigating Coordinate Transformation Bias in Target Tracking”, Proceedings of the SPIE, Jan. 1, 2000, pp. 414-427, vol. 4048, Bellingham, VA, USA, XP009100952, ISSN:0277-786X.
Miller, M. D. et al, “Coordinate Transformation Bias in Target Tracking” Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Signal and Data Processing on Small Targets, Jul. 1999, pp. 409-424, vol. 3809, Denver, Colorado, USA, XP009100949, ISSN: 0277-786X.
Zhao, Z. et al, “Optimal Linear Unbiased Filtering with Polar Measurements for Target Tracking” Information Fusion, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference, Jul. 8-11, 2002, pp. 1527-1534, XP010594375, ISBN: 978-0-9721844-1-0.
Zhansheng, D. et al. “Comments On Unbiased Converted Measurements For Tracking” IEEE Transactions On Aerospace And Electronic Systems, Oct. 2004, pp. 1374-1377, vol. 40, No. 4, USA, XP009100948, ISSN: 0018-9251.
Lerro, D. et al., “Tracking With Debiased Consistent Converted Measurements Versus EKF”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Jul. 1993, pp. 1015-1022, No. 3, USA, XP009100975.
Julier, S. J. et al, “Unscented Filtering and Nonlinear Estimation”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Mar. 2004, pp. 401-422, vol. 92, No. 3, USA, XP011108672, ISSN: 0018-9219.
Athans, M. et al., “Suboptimal State Estimation for Continuous-Time Nonlinear Systems from Discrete Noisy Measurements”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Oct. 1968, One (1) page, USA, XP-002482532.
Peach, N., “Bearings—Only Tracking Using a Set of Range—Parameterised Extended Kalman Filters”, IEE Proc.-Control Theory Appl., Jan. 1995, vol. 142, No. 1, XP-006003967, ISSN: 0143-7054.
Fraenken, D., “Some Results on Linear Unbiased Filtering with Polar Measurements”, IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, Sep. 3-6, 2006, pp. 297-302, Heidelberg, Germany.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method for determining the kinematic state of an object, by... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method for determining the kinematic state of an object, by..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for determining the kinematic state of an object, by... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2725319

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.