Collaborative content evaluation

Details Collaborative content evaluation Collaborative content evaluation

2011-06-21

2011-06-21

Breene, John (Department: 2162)

Data processing: database and file management or data structures

Database and file access

Preparing data for information retrieval

C707S770000, C707S805000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07966335

ABSTRACT:
In an example embodiment, a system for determining respective reputation values for a users of a network-based community is provided. The respective reputation values may be based on a user attribute associated with the user. The system may comprise a processor-implemented reputation component configured to determine respective reputation values for one or more users of a network-based community. Additionally included is a processor-implemented reporting component configured to receive a communication from the user identifying content as objectionable within the network-based community. The system also includes a processor-implemented evaluation component configured to evaluate the identified content based on the respective reputation values of the user to determine an action to take with respect to the content. Additionally included is a processor-implemented validation component configured to remove identified content from publication based on the respective reputation values transgressing a threshold value.

REFERENCES:
patent: 7275102 (2007-09-01), Yeager et al.
patent: 7308496 (2007-12-01), Yeager et al.
patent: 7328243 (2008-02-01), Yeager et al.
patent: 7533090 (2009-05-01), Agarwal et al.
patent: 7711684 (2010-05-01), Sundaresan et al.
patent: 7853600 (2010-12-01), Herz et al.
patent: 2002/0138402 (2002-09-01), Zacharia et al.
patent: 2003/0004846 (2003-01-01), Schneider
patent: 2003/0172050 (2003-09-01), Decime et al.
patent: 2004/0054661 (2004-03-01), Cheung et al.
patent: 2005/0209709 (2005-09-01), Bradshaw
patent: 2005/0216300 (2005-09-01), Appelman et al.
patent: 2006/0069667 (2006-03-01), Manasse et al.
patent: 2006/0235824 (2006-10-01), Cheung et al.
patent: 2006/0253458 (2006-11-01), Dixon et al.
patent: 2006/0253580 (2006-11-01), Dixon et al.
patent: 2006/0253584 (2006-11-01), Dixon et al.
patent: 2007/0078671 (2007-04-01), Dave et al.
patent: 2007/0100698 (2007-05-01), Neiman et al.
patent: 2007/0130350 (2007-06-01), Alperovitch et al.
patent: 2007/0192349 (2007-08-01), Farr et al.
patent: 2008/0015925 (2008-01-01), Sundaresan
patent: 2008/0046216 (2008-02-01), Thomas
patent: 2008/0059536 (2008-03-01), Brock et al.
patent: 2008/0097772 (2008-04-01), Brown et al.
patent: 2008/0114629 (2008-05-01), Pavlov
patent: 2008/0162265 (2008-07-01), Sundaresan et al.
patent: WO-2008082597 (2008-07-01), None
patent: WO-2008082597 (2008-07-01), None
Damiani et al.—“Fuzzy Techniques for Trust and Reputation Management in Anonymous Peer-to-Peer Systems”—Sep. 10-12, 2003, Zittan Germany (pp. 1-17).
Krit Wongrujira & Aruna Seneviratne—“Monetary Incentive with Reputation for Virtual Market-Place Based P2P”—CONEXT'05, Toulous, France, Oct. 21-27, 2005 (2005 ACM) (pp. 135-145).
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/026397, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Oct. 22, 2008”, 11 pgs.
Conti, et al., “Content delivery policies in replicated web services: client-side vs. server-side”,Cluster Computing, vol. 8, No. 1, (Jan. 2005), 47-60 Pgs.
Kaushik, et al., “Email feedback: a policy-based approach to overcoming false positives”, proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Formal methods in security engineering, session 2, (2005), 73-82 Pgs.
Milan, et al., “Performance Anal˜sis of reputation-based Mechanisms for multi-hop wireless networks”,Information science and systems,40t annual conference, IEEE, (Mar. 22-24, 2006), 12-17 Pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/646,888, Final Office Action mailed May 14, 2009”, 21 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/646,888, Response filed Oct. 14, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed May 14, 2009”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/646,888, Response filed Mar. 2, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 29, 2008”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/646,888, Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 29, 2008”, 20 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/646,888, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 15, 2009”, 14 Pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/026397, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Oct. 22, 2008”, p. 220, 11 pgs.
Conti, et al., “Content delivery policies in replicated web services: client-side vs. server-side”, Cluster Computing, vol. 8, No. 1, (Jan. 2005), 47-60 Pgs.
Milan, et al., “Performance Analysis of reputation-based Mechanisms for multi-hop wireless networks”, Information science and systems,40t annual conference, IEEE, (Mar. 22-24, 2006), 12-17 Pgs.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Collaborative content evaluation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Collaborative content evaluation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Collaborative content evaluation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2687718