Electricity: measuring and testing – Particle precession resonance – Spectrometer components
Reexamination Certificate
1999-11-09
2001-10-02
Arana, Louis (Department: 2862)
Electricity: measuring and testing
Particle precession resonance
Spectrometer components
C324S322000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06297635
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed to a gradient coil arrangement for a magnetic resonance tomography apparatus, for generating transverse or longitudinal gradient fields.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The required performance capability of a gradient coil is essentially dependent on the type of MR imaging. Conventional MR imaging usually requires a good linearity volume (−5% in the linearity volume of 40-50 cm) with moderate gradient strength (10-20 mT/m) and switching times (−1 ms). For fast MR imaging, high amplitude gradients (20-40 mT/m) are switched very fast (100-500 &mgr;s). As a result, side affects in the form of peripheral muscle stimulations can occur. In order to avoid these effects, the linearity volume of the gradient coils is generally reduced, which leads to a reduction of the maximum field boosts, and thus also leads to a reduction of the stimulation risk (the maximum field boost, in addition to other aspects, determines the stimulation risk). Given rapidly switched gradient coils, the linearity volume can thus diminish very quickly from, typically, 40-50 cm to 20 cm DSV. A coil having such properties is usually not suited for conventional whole-body applications, but is suitable for fast MR imaging techniques such as EP, RARE, HASTE, GRASE, etc. The speed is the important advantage.
Another reason for different field qualities is that the linearity generally decreases with the distance from the center when a gradient coil is designed for a specific volume. The human body, however, does not necessarily follow this rule. For example, the shoulders are located in this region. Given exposures of the spinal column, it is often meaningful to image the entire spinal column without repositioning. Dependent on the positioning of the center, the cervical and/or lumbar vertebra lie in the region of the greatest non-linearities. Image distortions are therefore unavoidable. Due to the smaller diameter of the coil, there is a smaller homogeneity volume for head gradient coils. This only allows the imaging of parts of the brain but not the imaging of the cervical spinal column. Therefore it can be desirable for the radiologist to switch from a central FOV to a displaced FOV. This, however, has not been hitherto possible. Only embodiments of the one or other type exist.
In order to avoid defining the field quality that the gradient coil arrangement should have at the time of manufacture which would result in an inflexible system unable to meet the differing needs of various customers, a magnetic resonance imaging system is disclosed in German OS 195 40 746 wherein a modular gradient system is employed, which combines a conventional and a fast gradient coil system in one coil body. The conventional gradient system has a large linearity volume that, however, can only be slowly switched and, moreover, only allows medium gradient amplitudes. The fast gradient system, by contrast, exhibits a smaller linearity volume but instead allows faster switching of very high gradient amplitudes. Fundamentally, however, this is nothing more than the combination of two completely separate gradient coil systems that are merely wound on the one and the same tubular carrier, with a series connection or parallel connections also being possible in addition to the separate drive of these gradient coil systems.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,349,318 discloses a gradient coil arrangement wherein conductors of the gradient coil are arranged essentially in a primary plane, which is an inner cylindrical envelope, and in a secondary plane, which is an outer cylindrical envelope which concentrically surrounds the inner cylindrical envelope. Each conductor arrangement of the respective two cylindrical envelopes contains a sub-coil having a helical conductor arrangement as well as a number of sub-coils having a horseshoe-shaped conductor arrangement. The open conductor ends of the sub-coils are firmly connected to one another, via conductive connecting wires, at an end side between the two cylindrical envelopes, the connecting wires being, for example, soldered to the coil conductor ends. The field quality of the gradient coil arrangement is thus also defined and is invariable.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide a gradient coil arrangement that makes it possible—dependent on the application—to modify the performance features or field qualities of the gradient coil in a broad range at the installation site in order to be able to optimally adapt the imaging properties to the respectively desired type of examination, without requiring a multitude of coils in the coil body.
This object is inventively achieved in a gradient coil arrangement having windings, arranged in a primary plane (as used herein “plane” means winding plane, which need not necessarily be flat, and in fact in actual usage will be a semi-cylindrical curved surface), further windings arranged in a secondary plane, the primary and the secondary planes being radial spaced from each other, the windings having a number of open (free) conductor ends at an end face of the gradient coil arrangement, connector elements that connect conductor ends of the primary plane to conductor ends of the secondary plane and/or conductor ends within one of the planes to one another, and the connector elements being switchable for forming gradient coil arrangements having different field qualities/performance features.
The selectable performance features are linearity, linearity volume, shielding inductance, noise (disturbance factors), stimulation sensitivity, maximum gradient strength, maximum slew rate, and symmetry/asymmetry.
The inventive gradient coil, which not only significantly decreases the coil volume since the number of coils for meeting different examination requirements is reduced, and as a result partially competing and/or disturbing sub-coil properties are avoided and the cost is reduced.
The inventive gradient coil arrangement is composed, for example, of a region that contains windings (coil turns) as well as another region that contains the open conductor ends in the return conductor area, these open conductor ends being connected to one another by connector elements. Because the connector elements are switchably designed, versatile different interconnections of the open conductor ends to one another are enabled, so that complete, different coil configurations having different field qualities or performance features can be formed without a separate coil with separate windings being required for this purpose.
It has proven expedient to arrange switchable connector elements at both end faces and, possibly, in the inside of the coil as well, in order to be able to create an entire series of functionally different gradient coil arrangements in an especially versatile way from the predetermined windings of the gradient coils, on the basis of correspondingly different interconnections of these windings with one another.
In a further embodiment switchable connector elements are integrated in the coil containing region and, thus, this region can also be functionally modified in reversible fashion according to the customers wishes on the basis of a correspondingly modified drive.
In an embodiment of the invention, the desired performance features can be statically determined before execution of a pulse (scanning) sequence and the connector elements can be subsequently switched as needed. In another embodiment, the connector elements can be fashioned to be dynamically switchable in a program-controlled manner, i.e. during the execution of a sequence.
The coils can thereby be interconnected to produce a shielded or non-shielded gradient coil arrangement. Moreover, the longitudinal (z-direction) halves of the windings can be asymmetrically interconnected. Thus, for example, the front half (+z) can have different field properties than the back half (−z) of the gradient coil arrangement. A displacement of the homogeneity volume is thereby possible.
REFERENCE
Arz Winfried
Gebhardt Matthias
Schmitt Franz
Schuster Johann
Arana Louis
Schiff & Hardin & Waite
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
LandOfFree
Switchable gradient coil arrangement does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Switchable gradient coil arrangement, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Switchable gradient coil arrangement will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2611298