Aeronautics and astronautics – Spacecraft – Spacecraft formation – orbit – or interplanetary path
Reexamination Certificate
1999-11-19
2001-12-04
Jordan, Charles T. (Department: 3644)
Aeronautics and astronautics
Spacecraft
Spacecraft formation, orbit, or interplanetary path
Reexamination Certificate
active
06325332
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates generally to coordinatable systems of geosynchronous satellite orbits and particularly to such systems wherein planes defined by the satellite orbit are inclined with respect to the Earth's equatorial plane and wherein the satellites are respectively phased in a systematically coordinated fashion that enables and promotes frequency re-use.
BACKGROUND ART
Satellites in geostationary orbits (GSO's) have been widely preferred for several decades because of the economic advantages afforded by such orbits. In a geostationary orbit, a satellite traveling above the Earth's equator, in the same direction as that in which the Earth is rotating, and at the same angular velocity, appears stationary relative to a point on the Earth. These satellites are always “in view” at all locations within their service areas, so their utilization efficiency is effectively 100 percent. Antennas on Earth need be aimed at a GSO satellite only once; no tracking system is required.
Coordination between GSO's and with terrestrial services is facilitated by designated allocation of designated “slots” angularly separated according to service type.
Given the desirability of geostationary satellite orbits and the fact that there are only a finite number of available “slots” in the geostationary “belt,” the latter has been essentially saturated with satellites operating in desirable frequency bands up through the Ku-band (up to 18 GHz). AS a result, the government has been auctioning the increasingly scarce remaining slots. This has encouraged the development of complex and expensive new systems including those using low Earth orbits (LEO's), medium Earth orbits (MEO's), and higher frequencies, for example, the Ka-band (up to (approximately) 40 GHz).
Growth to higher frequencies is limited by difficult problems of technology and propagation, and expansion in satellite applications requires exploitation of the spatial dimension (i.e., above and below the GSO belt). A host of proposed LEO and MEO systems exemplify this direction.
The recently filed LEO and MEO system applications, however, introduce a significant problem. Frequency coordination and sharing are made difficult by the unstructured criss-crossings of the lines of sight of these systems. This has the potential of severely impeding effective spectrum use with nongeostationary orbits (NGSO) in general.
There has been no known prior effort to exploit coordinatable systems of inclined geosynchronous orbits (IGO's) in a systematic manner, even though the unused domain of inclined geogynchronous orbits offers great potential for the coordinatable growth of satellite service.
The prior art that bears the closest resemblance to the disclosed invention is the original, 12-hour, elliptic orbit, Soviet communications satellites (Molniya 1A, April 1955) that shared a common ground track with three or four satellites per group. Over the years, a number of Cosmos satellites employed these highly elliptic Molniya orbits (44,000 km apogee, 400 km perigee, inclined 63 degrees to minimize apsidal drift) for military purposes. Significant differences and limitations (compared with the present invention) of these 12-hour orbits include unavoidable intertrack crossings that prohibit coordinatable growth, low coverage efficiency for a given region, limited operating life due to the atmospheric drag attending a low-perigee orbit, and radiation belt traversal. The 12-hour period also requires handoff at least four times daily. For these reasons, these orbits do not lend themselves to a large coordinated system with region focus.
Listings of current orbital parameters show many older satellites that have deteriorated into inclined geosynchronous orbits, but this is due simply to the exhaustion of station-keeping fuel.
While the various prior techniques function with a certain degree of competence, none discloses the advantages of the coordinatable system of geosynchronous satellite orbits of the present invention as is hereinafter more fully described
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide a framework for the growth of geosynchronous satellite services accommodating multiple service operations.
Another object is to enable frequency re-use of spectrum from regional (geosynchronous) satellites in an easily coordinated manner analogous to that of geostationary services.
Yet another object is to avoid or delay the technical and financial challenges of moving to still higher frequencies for expansion.
Still another object is to provide predominantly specific hemispheric or regional coverage rather than global coverage.
An additional object is to provide a satellite system having a greater utilization efficiency than systems using low Earth orbits (LEO's) and systems using medium Earth orbits (MEO's).
An advantage of the present invention is that it provides an expanded use of spectrum up through C, Ku- and Ka-bands, using predominantly off-the-shelf hardware.
Another advantage is that the present invention avoids difficulties in frequency coordination and spectrum re-use, which are encountered with lower altitude (LEO and MEO) orbits.
A feature of the present invention is that it provides an orderly method for expanding the capacity of coordinatable orbit space by a large factor, in numbers exceeding the capacity of the geostationary (GSO) belt.
Another feature of the present invention is that it is capable of being tailored to center a service window for a specific service region with respect to an optimum time of day.
In realizing the aforementioned and other objects, advantages and features of the satellite communications system of the present invention, a plurality of coordinated and synchronized sets of moving “slots,” each of which is a potential satellite location, is established.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3497807 (1970-02-01), Newton
patent: 4691882 (1987-09-01), Young
patent: 4809935 (1989-03-01), Draim
patent: 5119225 (1992-06-01), Grant et al.
patent: 5120007 (1992-06-01), Pocha et al.
patent: 5551624 (1996-09-01), Horstein et al.
patent: 5619211 (1997-04-01), Horkin et al.
patent: 5641134 (1997-06-01), Vatt
patent: 5669585 (1997-09-01), Castiel et al.
patent: 5810297 (1998-09-01), Basuthakur et al.
patent: 5867783 (1999-02-01), Horstein et al.
patent: 5871181 (1999-02-01), Mass
patent: 5979830 (1999-11-01), Kellermeier
Chiba, I., et al. “Inclined Geo Satellite Communication System With Deployable Phased Array Antennas” (1997) AIAA pp. 243-249.
Effects of NGSO Provisional EPFD, APFD Limits on “Quasi-Geostationary Systems” (1998) ITU.
Cellier Alfred
Rey Raul D.
Dinh Tien
Duraiswamy Vijayalakshmi D.
Hughes Electronics Corporation
Jordan Charles T.
Sales Michael W.
LandOfFree
Coordinatable system of inclined geosynchronous satellite... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Coordinatable system of inclined geosynchronous satellite..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Coordinatable system of inclined geosynchronous satellite... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2602659