Registers – Systems controlled by data bearing records – Credit or identification card systems
Reexamination Certificate
1999-05-03
2001-12-25
Frech, Karl D. (Department: 2876)
Registers
Systems controlled by data bearing records
Credit or identification card systems
C235S382500
Reexamination Certificate
active
06332572
ABSTRACT:
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
The disclosure of Japanese Patent Application No. HEI 10-123604 filed on May 6, 1998, including the specification, drawings and abstract, is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to a key code security arrangement that determines whether a particular key is authorized. An interrogator unit sends a key code request to a key-based transponder unit. In response to the request, the key-based transponder unit transmits a signal including its pre-assigned key code. The interrogator unit then compares the key code transmitted by the transponder unit with key codes previously stored in the interrogator unit.
2. Description of Related Art
Because convention keys are easy to duplicate, there are various kinds of key code security arrangements used in motor vehicles. It is desirable to be able to easily determine whether a particular key inserted into an ignition switch key lock is an authorized key. Various kinds of immobilizer systems are known. Such systems prevent the motor vehicle from being operated if the key is not authorized. When an attempt is made to start an engine without using a correct key, an immobilizer system may, for example, prohibit the supply of fuel to the engine, prevent ignition or otherwise interfere with the operation of the motor vehicle.
In general, such systems rely on the use of two separate units. A vehicle-side unit is, essentially, an interrogator device that sends request signals to key-based transponder units. The vehicle-side interrogator unit includes an immobilizer coil that is wrapped around a key cylinder of the ignition system. The transponder is built into the ignition key. The interrogator unit transmits a signal constituting a request. This signal is transmitted via the immobilizer coil which functions as an antenna. The request signal is received by the key-based transponder. The request signal can be used to provide operating power to the transponder and, of course, carries the request itself. In response to the request, the transponder transmits a signal including a key code previously assigned to that key and stored in a memory of the transponder.
The interrogator unit receives the transmitted key code and compares it with a plurality of previously registered reference key codes stored in a memory associated with the interrogator unit. If there is a match indicating that the key responding is authorized, the vehicle-side device permits the vehicle to be operated. For many such systems, a plurality of keys are manufactured and authorized and it is intended that any of them can be used. The immobilizer system must, therefore, be able to cope with a plurality of key codes. According to Japanese Patent Publication Laid-Open No. HEI 9-88390, a plurality of key codes are registered in the vehicle-side device. Then, according to a predetermined priority sequence, there is an attempt to correlate a received key code with one authorized code after another. In this manner, the immobilizer system can cope with a plurality of key codes.
In some cases, a plurality of keys, such as on a key ring, may be in the vicinity of the key cylinder. This situation is depicted in FIG.
7
. One of two keys on the key ring is inserted into the key cylinder. However the transponders of both keys are likely to respond to a request from the interrogator unit because both are in close proximity to the immobilizer coil. Accordingly, two transponders respond to a key code request from the vehicle-side device. These responses interfere with each other and confuse the vehicle-side interrogator device.
To prevent such interference, key-specific key code requests for each authorized key can be transmitted by the interrogator unit one by one in sequence. Each key-based transponder will only respond to its key-specific request. This avoids the interference problem due to simultaneous responses by a plurality of key-based transponders. However, if there are many authorized keys, this process of sending sequential key code requests and waiting for appropriate responses can be very time consuming. This process also consumes significant power. This situation is unacceptable. When a vehicle is stopped, the process of interrogation may be repeated many times.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention set forth herein overcomes the problem of interference by multiple authorized keys. It utilizes a more rational scheme for interrogating keys attempting to operate the vehicle. The scheme presented herein is efficient and can usually be carried out in a reasonable length of time.
The claimed arrangement includes a vehicle-side interrogator unit and a key-based transponder unit. The interrogator unit includes a transmitter for sending requests and a receiver for receiving key code signals from key-based transponder units. Each key-based transponder unit includes a memory storing a previously assigned key code that is specific to that key. This key code is transmitted in response to a request from the vehicle-side interrogator unit. After receiving a key code transmitted by a transponder unit, the interrogator unit reviews previously stored key codes in its associated memory to see if there is a match between the key code received and one of the codes previously stored. If there is a match, then the key transmitting the key code is considered to be authorized.
The interrogator unit includes a key code memory storing a plurality of key codes, a key code request changing means for differentiating key code requests for each of a plurality of key codes, and interference determination means for determining whether or not answer signals responding to a key code request interfere with one another. If the interference determination means has determined that there is interference, a key code request is individually changed by the key code request changing means, a request for an individual key code is formed and sent out, and then comparison is made between the key code answer by the transponder unit and the expected key code.
At first, a general key code request is made, rather than a key specific request. This is done because much of the time there will not be interference between two or more transponder units responding to such a general request. Only when it has been determined that there is interference between two or more answers will the interrogator formulate key-specific requests and try them one at a time, sequentially. Accordingly, time is not wasted when there is no interference among responses, and a general key code request suffices. This reduces the number of key code requests in most cases, allowing an answer to be obtained quickly and efficiently. If there is no interference by two or more answers to a general key code request, plurality key codes stored in memory of the interrogator unit can be compared with the answer according to a predetermined sequence. Thus, correlation can be carried out reliably with respect to a plurality of key codes.
Only in the case of interference is it necessary to formulate and transmit key-specific key code requests that are differentiated for each key code. Thus, normally, any key is able to respond quickly, and the time required to terminate a correlation process can be reduced.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4931664 (1990-06-01), Knoll
patent: 4980680 (1990-12-01), Knoll et al.
patent: 5038023 (1991-08-01), Saliga
patent: 5461386 (1995-10-01), Knelbelkamp
patent: 5543798 (1996-08-01), Schuermann
patent: 5552789 (1996-09-01), Schuermann
patent: 5561430 (1996-10-01), Knebelkamp
patent: 5675490 (1997-10-01), Bachhuber
patent: 5742236 (1998-04-01), Cremers et al.
patent: 5773803 (1998-06-01), Fukuta
patent: 5796329 (1998-08-01), Bachhuber
patent: 5937065 (1999-08-01), Simon et al.
patent: 6043752 (2000-03-01), Hisada et al.
patent: 6085805 (2000-07-01), Bates
patent: 411150714-A (1999-09-01), None
Onishi Noriyasu
Yamamoto Keiji
Frech Karl D.
Pillsbury Winthrop L.L.P.
Toyota Jidosha & Kabushiki Kaisha
LandOfFree
Key code correlation security does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Key code correlation security, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Key code correlation security will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2567840