Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system – Plural physical display element control system – Display elements arranged in matrix
Reexamination Certificate
1998-07-23
2001-10-30
Hjerpe, Richard (Department: 2674)
Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system
Plural physical display element control system
Display elements arranged in matrix
C345S182000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06310588
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(1) Field of the Invention
This invention relates to an image display apparatus which uses a display panel, such as a plasma display panel, that displays images by a multi-level gray scale by dividing one TV field of the image into a plurality of subfields, and especially to an image display apparatus which displays images of improved quality. This invention also relates to an image evaluation apparatus which evaluates images displayed in such an image display apparatus.
(2) Description of the Prior Art
Image display apparatuses which use display panels based on a binary illumination system, namely, two illumination states in which each pixel can be ON or OFF, represented in this specification by plasma display panels (hereinafter simply referred to as “PDPs”), achieve gray scale displays by methods such as the Address Display Period Separated Sub-Field method. In this method, an image is displayed by dividing the time in one TV field into a plurality of subfields which are each composed of an addressing period in which ON/OFF data is written for each line of a PDP screen and a discharge sustaining period in which predetermined pixels are illuminated all at once.
It is conventionally known that when displaying a moving image in a multi-level gray scale by dividing each TV field of the moving image into a plurality of subfields, gray scale disturbance in the form of “false edge” appears on the screen.
The following is an explanation of an occurrence of such false edges when displaying a moving image.
FIG. 35
shows movement of a picture pattern PA
1
on a screen of a PDP
240
, the picture pattern PA
1
being composed of two pairs of adjacent pixels having the similar gray scale levels 127 and 128 respectively. In this example, the picture pattern PA
1
moves horizontally by two pixels per TV field. In
FIG. 36
, the horizontal axis shows a relative position of each pixel on the screen, and the vertical axis shows a period which for convenience's sake corresponds to one TV field.
FIG. 36
also shows how the movement of the picture pattern PA
1
appears to a viewer. Here, a case is explained in which each piece of 8-bit data indicating one out of 256 gray scale levels is converted into a piece of 8-bit data showing ON/OFF states of eight subfields
1
-
8
. The gray scale display is achieved in accordance with the ON/OFF states of the eight subfields. As a specific example, the time in one TV field is divided into subfields
1
-
8
which are assigned luminance weights, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 and 128, respectively (in ascending order). In this case, the gray scale level 127 can be expressed by illuminating the subfields
1
-
7
(diagonally shaded areas on the left in
FIG. 36
) and not illuminating the subfield
8
, while the gray scale level 128 can be expressed by not illuminating the subfields
1
-
7
and illuminating the subfield
8
(diagonally shaded area on the right in FIG.
36
).
When displaying a still picture, the average luminance of one TV field of the observed image is expressed by the integral of the illumination periods between A-A′ in
FIG. 35
, so that the desired gray scale level is properly displayed. On the other hand, when displaying a moving image, an integral of the illumination periods of either B-B′ or C-C′, depending on the direction followed by the eye, is observed on the retina. The total luminance weights assigned to each bit (subfield) between B-B′ is approximately 0, while the total luminance weights assigned to each bit (subfield) between C-C′ is approximately 255. Thus, when observing the movement of a picture pattern in which two similar gray scale levels, such as the gray scale levels 127 and 128, are adjacent, the boundary between the adjacent pixels of the gray scale levels appear profoundly disturbed as shown in FIG.
36
.
As explained above, a halftone is represented by an integral of luminance values of each subfield in a time series. Accordingly, when the eye follows a moving image, luminance weights assigned to the subfields of different gray scale levels are integrated due to the position change. As a result, the halftone display appears profoundly disturbed. It should be noted here that this halftone disturbance appears as false edges in the image, and so generally referred to as the “moving image false edge.” Such false occurrences in a moving image display are explained in detail in Hiraki Uchiike and Shigeru Mikoshiba,
All About Plasma Display,
Kogyo Chosakai Shuppan, (May 1, 1997), pp. 165-177.
In order to eliminate moving image false edges and reduce halftone disturbance in a moving image display, an attempt has been made with conventional image display apparatuses to divide the luminance weights of the subfields
7
and
8
as upper bits and intersperse the divided parts in the first and second halves of one TV field.
FIG. 37
shows a subfield construction in a conventional method for reducing the moving image false edges by using ten subfields to display 8-bit gray scale levels, that is, 256 gray scale levels. The ten subfields are assigned luminance weights of 48, 48, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 48, and 48 in order of time. That is to say, the combined luminance weight value of 64 and 128 for subfields
7
and
8
out of the eight subfields described above is divided into four equal luminance weights ((64+128)/4−192/4=48), which are then interspersed in the first and second halves of one field to prevent the occurrence of the halftone disturbance by reducing the luminance weights of the subfields of upper bits. With this technique, halftone disturbance is scarcely observed at the boundary between the adjacent pixels of gray scale levels 127 and 128 described above, so that the occurrence of the moving image false edges can be prevented for those values. However, for a different example, like the two pairs of adjacent pixels having gray scale levels 63 and 64 respectively shown in
FIG. 37
, halftone disturbance is inevitably observed at the boundary between the adjacent pixels. In the drawing, in the pixels of gray scale level 64, a subfield with a large luminance weight (here, the subfield
9
) is turned ON while subfields with small luminance weights (here, the subfields
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
, and
8
) are turned OFF. The distribution of ON/OFF subfields greatly changes from the previous pixels. As a result, halftone disturbance is inevitably observed at the boundary between the adjacent pixels. As shown in
FIG. 37
, the total luminance weights assigned to each bit (subfield) observed in the direction of the dotted line arrow Ya is approximately 79, while the total luminance weights assigned to each bit (subfield) observed in the direction of the dotted line arrow Yb is approximately 32. Thus, it is still not possible to prevent the occurrence of the moving image false edges in such a case.
Also, in the above-described method of evaluating the moving image false edge, the following problems are found. That is, in this method, all the luminance weights of the subfields on the dotted line arrow Ya or Yb shown in
FIG. 37
are added up to detect the occurrence of the moving image false edge. In such a case, there is a possibility that the total luminance weights assigned to the subfields greatly change when the directions of the dotted line arrows slightly change due to the change of subfields included in these lines, as shown in the dotted line arrow Yc for Ya and Yd for Yb in the drawing. As described above, in the conventional method in which the luminance weights are added up based on a binary determination of ON/OFF subfields on a dotted line, only a slight change in the direction followed by the eye may generate a great difference in the result value of the total luminance weights which is used for the evaluation of the moving image false edge. This leads to a difference between the evaluation result and the actual image observed by a viewer.
Also, another problem of the conventional evaluation method is that the method does not cover slant movemen
Kawahara Isao
Sekimoto Kunio
Hjerpe Richard
Matsushita Electric - Industrial Co., Ltd.
Price and Gess
LandOfFree
Image display apparatus and image evaluation apparatus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Image display apparatus and image evaluation apparatus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Image display apparatus and image evaluation apparatus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2567511