Transmitter diversity technique for wireless communications

Details Transmitter diversity technique for wireless communications Transmitter diversity technique for wireless communications

1998-05-07

2001-02-06

Pham, Chi H. (Department: 2731)

Pulse or digital communications

Systems using alternating or pulsating current

Plural channels for transmission of a single pulse train

C375S347000, 37

Reexamination Certificate

active

06185258

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to wireless communication and, more particularly, to techniques for effective wireless communication in the presence of fading and other degradations.
The most effective technique for mitigating multipath fading in a wireless radio channel is to cancel the effect of fading at the transmitter by controlling the transmitter's power. That is, if the channel conditions are known at the transmitter (on one side of the link), then the transmitter can pre-distort the signal to overcome the effect of the channel at the receiver (on the other side). However, there are two fundamental problems with this approach. The first problem is the transmitter's dynamic range. For the transmitter to overcome an x dB fade, it must increase its power by x dB which, in most cases, is not practical because of radiation power limitations, and the size and cost of amplifiers. The second problem is that the transmitter does not have any knowledge of the channel as seen by the receiver (except for time division duplex systems, where the transmitter receives power from a known other transmitter over the same channel). Therefore, if one wants to control a transmitter based on channel characteristics, channel information has to be sent from the receiver to the transmitter, which results in throughput degradation and added complexity to both the transmitter and the receiver.
Other effective techniques are time and frequency diversity. Using time interleaving together with coding can provide diversity improvement The same holds for frequency hopping and spread spectrum. However, time interleaving results in unnecessarily large delays when the channel is slowly varying. Equivalently, frequency diversity techniques are ineffective when the coherence bandwidth of the channel is large (small delay spread).
It is well known that in most scattering environments antenna diversity is the most practical and effective technique for reducing the effect of multipath fading. The classical approach to antenna diversity is to use multiple antennas at the receiver and perform combining (or selection) to improve the quality of the received signal.
The major problem with using the receiver diversity approach in current wireless communication systems, such as IS-136 and GSM, is the cost, size and power consumption constraints of the receivers. For obvious reasons, small size, weight and cost are paramount. The addition of multiple antennas and RF chains (or selection and switching circuits) in receivers is presently not be feasible. As a result, diversity techniques have often been applied only to improve the up-link (receiver to base) transmission quality with multiple antennas (and receivers) at the base station. Since a base station often serves thousands of receivers, it is more economical to add equipment to base stations rather than the receivers
Recently, some interesting approaches for transmitter diversity have been suggested. A delay diversity scheme was proposed by A. Wittneben in “Base Station Modulation Diversity for Digital SIMULCAST,” Proceeding of the 1991 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 41 st), PP. 848-853, May 1991, and in “A New Bandwidth Efficient Transmit Antenna Modulation Diversity Scheme For Linear Digital Modulation,” in Proceeding of the 1993 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IICC '93), PP. 1630-1634, May 1993. The proposal is for a base station to transmit a sequence of symbols through one antenna, and the same sequence of symbols—but delayed—through another antenna.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,479,448, issued to Nambirajan Seshadri on Dec. 26, 1995, discloses a similar arrangement where a sequence of codes is transmitted through two antennas. The sequence of codes is routed through a cycling switch that directs each code to the various antennas, in succession. Since copies of the same symbol are transmitted through multiple antennas at different times, both space and time diversity are achieved. A maximum likelihood sequence estimator (MLSE) or a minimum mean squared error (MMSE) equalizer is then used to resolve multipath distortion and provide diversity gain. See also N. Seshadri, J. H. Winters, “Two Signaling Schemes for Improving the Error Performance of FDD Transmission Systems Using Transmitter Antenna Diversity,”
Proceeding of the
1993
IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference
(VTC 43rd), pp. 508-511, May 1993; and J. H. Winters, “The Diversity Gain of Transmit Diversity in Wireless Systems with Rayleigh Fading,”
Proceeding of the
1994
ICC/SUPERCOMM
, New Orleans, Vol. 2, PP. 1121-1125, May 1994.
Still another interesting approach is disclosed by Tarokh, Seshadri, Calderbank and Naguib in U.S. application, Ser. No. 08/847635, filed Apr. 25, 1997 (based on a provisional application filed Nov. 7, 1996), where symbols are encoded according to the antennas through which they are simultaneously transmitted, and are decoded using a maximum likelihood decoder. More specifically, the process at the transmitter handles the information in blocks of M
1
bits, where M
1
is a multiple of M
2
, i.e., M
1
=k*M
2
. It converts each successive group of M
2
bits into information symbols (generating thereby k information symbols), encodes each sequence of k information symbols into n channel codes (developing thereby a group of n channel codes for each sequence of k information symbols), and applies each code of a group of codes to a different antenna
SUMMARY
The problems of prior art systems are overcome, and an advance in the art is realized with a simple block coding arrangement where symbols are transmitted over a plurality of transmit channels and the coding comprises only of simple arithmetic operations, such as negation and conjugation. The diversity created by the transmitter utilizes space diversity and either time diversity or frequency diversity. Space diversity is effected by redundantly transmitting over a plurality of antennas; time diversity is effected by redundantly transmitting at different times; and frequency diversity is effected by redundantly transmitting at different frequencies. Illustratively, using two transmit antennas and a single receive antenna, one of the disclosed embodiments provides the same diversity gain as the maximal-ratio receiver combining (MRRC) scheme with one transmit antenna and two receive antennas. The novel approach does not require any bandwidth expansion or feedback from the receiver to the transmitter, and has the same decoding complexity as the MRRC. The diversity improvement is equal to applying maximal-ratio receiver combining (MRRC) at the receiver with the same number of antennas. The principles of this invention are applicable to arrangements with more than two antennas, and an illustrative embodiment is disclosed using the same space lock code with two transmit and two receive antennas. This scheme provides the same diversity gain as four-branch MRRC.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3978408 (1976-08-01), Gupta et al.
patent: 4001692 (1977-01-01), Fenwick
patent: 4099121 (1978-07-01), Fang
patent: 4369516 (1983-01-01), Byrns
patent: 4567464 (1986-01-01), Siegel et al.
patent: 4763331 (1988-08-01), Matsumoto
patent: 5029185 (1991-07-01), Wei
patent: 5088113 (1992-02-01), Wei
patent: 5101501 (1992-03-01), Gilhousen et al.
patent: 5109390 (1992-04-01), Gilhousen et al.
patent: 5283870 (1994-02-01), Schuchman et al.
patent: 5319667 (1994-06-01), Kim
patent: 5416797 (1995-05-01), Gilhousen et al.
patent: 5442627 (1995-08-01), Viterbi et al.
patent: 5457712 (1995-10-01), Weerackody
patent: 5461646 (1995-10-01), Anvari
patent: 5499272 (1996-03-01), Bottomley
patent: 5848103 (1998-12-01), Weerackody
patent: 0 767 546 A2 (1997-09-01), None

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Transmitter diversity technique for wireless communications does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Transmitter diversity technique for wireless communications, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Transmitter diversity technique for wireless communications will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2566264