Data processing: speech signal processing – linguistics – language – Linguistics – Translation machine
Reexamination Certificate
1998-03-03
2001-05-15
Thomas, Joseph (Department: 2747)
Data processing: speech signal processing, linguistics, language
Linguistics
Translation machine
C704S009000, C706S062000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06233545
ABSTRACT:
CONTENTS
PART I
Part I, Section 1: Introduction
1. Title, 1
2. Field of the Invention, 5
3. Background of the Invention, 5
4. Summary of the Invention, 14
5. Objectives of the Invention, 17
6. Brief Description of the Drawings, 40
7. List of Reference Numerals, 50
PART II: Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
Part II, Section 1: Theory of the Invention
Theory, Introduction, 60
Theory, Section 1: The Tradition of State of Being, 70
1. The Limitations of Science's Reliance on the Observer of the Universe, 76
2. The Ultimately Real Creation of the Universe's Matter, 83
3. An Epistemological Interpretation of the Physical Universe: Mass and Energy as Moments of their Observer, 104
4. The Introspective Observation of Ultimate Reality, 119
5. An Epistemological Generalization of the Universe's Eternal Moments, 131
Theory, Section 2: The Four Universal Ways of Knowing, 142
1. What is a Form? 142
2. Distinguishing between the Enabler of the Universe and the Universe Enabled, 148
3. The Phenomenon of the Universe's Eternal Moments, 152
4. Four Universal Phenomena, or Ways of Knowing in the Enabler's Existence, 156
5. How the Universe's Moments are Caused: Phenomenological Causation, 162
6. How the Universe's Moments are Connected: Phenomenological Connectedness, 169
7. How the Universe's Moments are Composed: Phenomenological Composition, 175
8. How the Universe's Moments are Created: Phenomenological Correspondence, 184
Theory, Section 3: The Arbitrary Forms of Existence, 199
1. The Philosophies of Humankind, 204
2. The Philosophical Ideals of the Mind-Body Dualism, 209
3. The Existential Form of Enablement, 210
4. The Existential Forms of Non-Real and Real Form, 211
5. The Existential Form of Embodiment, 212
6. The Existential Form of the Modes of Existence, 213
7. The Existential Form of the Faculties of Mind, 215
8. A Working Theory of Existence, 220
9. The Existential Form of Enabling Media, 222
Theory, Section 4: A Universal Grammar of Form on Being, 225
1. A Language's Representation of the Objects of the Universe: Nouns, 233
2. A Universal Grammatical Form of Language: The Phenomenological Sentence, 245
3. A Language's Representation of the Universe's Eternal Moments: Verbs, 248
4. The Semantic Use of Language by Arbitrary Forms of Existence: Composition and Style, 258
Theory, Section 5: Androids, or Synthetic Beings, 267
1. An Early Experiment in the Creation of Androids, 270
2. Generalizing the Enabling Media of Androids, 291
3. Constructing Androids with the Knowledges of Humankind, 301
4. A Sentient Being: The Modes of Existence, 301
5. A Thinking Being: The Faculties of Mind, 307
6. A Moral Being: The Conscience, 316
7. The Expansion of the Human Existential Universe, 325
Part II, Section 2: The Existential Forms of the Invention in U. G.
1. Overview of the Existential Form of the Invention, 334
2. The Quantum Nature of the Forms of the Invention, 348
3. The Principle Existential (Epistemological) Machine Element of the Invention: The Modal Realization System (of the Rg Module), 356
Part II, Section 3: The Phenomenology of the Invention in U. G.
1. Overview of the Principle Phenomenology of the Invention, 363
2. Detailed Description of the Realization System, 429
3. Detailed Description of the Dependent System, 430
4. Detailed Description of the Controller System, 437
5. Detailed Description of the Human Interface System, 452
6. Detailed Description of the Support System, 453
7. Detailed Description of the Terminal System, 460
8. Detailed Description of the Correspondence Determination System, 471
9. Detailed Description of the Correspondence System, 488
10. Detailed Description of the Modes of the Rg Module and Rg Continuum, 502
Part II, Section 4: The Enabling Media of the Invention
1. The General Method of Translation of the U. M. to Enabling Media, 511
2. Translations of the U. M. to Classically Physical Media, 529
3. Translations of the U. M. to Electronics, Computers and Communications Enabling Media, 554
4. Translations of the U. M. to Classically Biological and Quantum Physical Media, 584
5. Translations of the U. M. to Classically Institutional Enabling Media, 589
Part II, Section 5: Androids
1. The Construction of Androids, 593
PART III
Part III, Section 1: Conclusion
1. Ramifications of the Invention, 599
Part III, Section 2: A Universal Machine Translator of Arbitrary Languages, 603
Part III, Section 3: Claims of the Invention, 744
Part III, Section 4: Abstract, 746
Part III, Section 5: Drawings
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the creation and use of synthetic forms of existence, or androids, and more specifically relates to the development of a universal epistemological machine in which any forms of the universe, conventional technologies included, are represented, embodied and realized as eternal moments of an infinitely expanding continuum of enabled existential forms, as an alternative approach to resolving the problems of the human condition.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The science of androids concerns the creation of synthetic beings, or forms of existence that are made in the image of human being, though in capacities that extend far beyond those of human corporal form. The prior art of the present invention, therefore, is any technology that is alleged to be a thinking or perceiving machine—herein referred to as an epistemological machine—which includes, for example, robots and artificially intelligent computational electronic and biological machines.
If the basic goal of our human effort in classical approaches to the development of technology is considered, it can be observed that the replacement of human effort itself is a principal objective of even the simplest technological accomplishments, since the alleviation of the burdens of the intellectual and physical labors of human existence is evident even in our philosophies and religions guiding everyday life. Any example of a technology demonstrates this. The wheel, though only a primitive enhancement to the reduction of the physical labor of motion and power (transportation), changed, in its time, the cultural settings of entire civilizations in a contributory way, and built toward the displacement of human corporal form itself. In the post-modem era, the computer, an embodiment in physical matter of primitive grammatical language forms of what we know of the world around us—grammars referred to in the art as computations (algorithms)—contributes toward the displacement of human corporal form by providing for the first time in history (save the abacus), for the ordinary person, the alleviation of repetitive intellectual tasks that can be defined in the languages developed for the art. Thus, whether we observe a monkey probing an ant hill with a stick to derive nourishment or a man walking on the moon, the underlying motivation of beings in regard to ordered reconstructions of the physical world (technology) is to displace themselves with machinery.
In history, however, implied in the nature of our institutions is the tenuous premise that human corporal form could not be wholly replaced—that is, to the extent that it is known. It is implied in our conventions that institutions themselves are a bounding form to a relatively fixed, finite universe of human beings. It is presumed in our traditional knowledges of the world that the knowing and perceiving of the world around us by human existence could not be augmented, as a technology, to unbounded proportions, expanding the existential universe indefinitely. As a result of this limitation accepted fatalistically in our conventional thinking, technology is viewed as a reconstruction of the physical and, with the advent of computers, the intellectual universe only in support of, not as a total replacement for, the knowledges and experiences of human beings under the existential premises of institutions. The information superhighway, for example, provides information for human beings within the constraints of our institutional thinking. It does not, howe
McDermott & Will & Emery
Thomas Joseph
LandOfFree
Universal machine translator of arbitrary languages... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Universal machine translator of arbitrary languages..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Universal machine translator of arbitrary languages... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2563667