Offset resonant ZVS forward converter

Electric power conversion systems – Current conversion – Including d.c.-a.c.-d.c. converter

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C363S097000, C363S131000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06249444

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to switched power supplies, and more specifically, to a forward converter that incorporates a switched shunt inductance coupled in parallel across the primary winding of the power transformer. The shunt inductance is used to produce a zero volt switching condition across the power switch of the power supply, permitting the power switch to be resonantly switched on with zero volts across it. In one embodiment, the converter circuit also includes an offset capacitor in series with the switched inductance, and a magnetic voltage averaging circuit. These components act to average the voltage across the primary power switch and control the magnetizing current in the power transformer. These features reduce the power losses associated with changing the state of the power switch compared to conventional zero volt switching forward converter circuits, and improve the overall efficiency of the converter by acting to reset the magnetic core of the power transformer.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Switching or “switch mode” power supplies use a semiconductor device as a power switch to control the application of a voltage to a load. A forward converter is used to provide a regulated output (or load) voltage which is lower than the input voltage (V
IN
) supplied by the input power supply.
FIG. 1
is a schematic diagram showing a circuit for a conventional prior art forward converter
100
. Applying a waveform to gate node
103
controls the operation of power switch Q
1
102
(which is shown as a MOSFET device but may be of other types). The waveform applied to gate node
103
is typically provided by a control circuit (not shown) which supplies a pulsed control signal using pulse width modulation (PWM), for example. When switch
102
is turned “on”, i.e., conducting, the input voltage V
IN
is applied across the primary winding of power transformer
104
. A secondary voltage, V
S
, is developed across the secondary winding of transformer
104
and applied across forward output rectifier D
O1
106
(which then becomes forward biased). Current and power flows to output inductor L
O
108
and output capacitor C
O
110
(which form a LC filter), and load R
L
. Assuming a sufficiently large enough value for output capacitor C
O
110
, and neglecting diode drops and losses, the voltage across inductor
108
will be equal to V
S
minus the output voltage, V
OUT
. The current (i
L
) in inductor
108
will increase linearly with time and will be described by:
di
L
/dt=
(
V
S
−V
OUT
)L
O
.
Note that additional losses may be caused by an increase in the conduction losses in the primary circuit due to the higher RMS current necessary to sustain a resonance condition.
When power switch Q
1
is turned off, i.e., non-conducting, the secondary voltage V
S
will reverse. However, the current in inductor
108
will continue to flow in the forward direction rendering “freewheeling” output diode D
O2
112
conductive (forward biased). This permits the current to continue circulating in the circuit loop formed from diode
112
, inductor
108
, capacitor
110
, and load R
L
(which is applied across the output terminals). The voltage across inductor
108
eventually reverses, having a value equal to the output voltage V
OUT
(again neglecting diode drops). The current in inductor
108
now decreases with time, and may be described by:
di
L
/dt=
(−
V
OUT
)/
L
O
.
In a steady-state condition, the volt-seconds applied to inductor
108
are equal in the forward and reverse directions. Thus, when the “on” period for switch
102
(t
on
) during a cycle is equal to the “off” period (t
off
) during a cycle, the output voltage V
OUT
will be equal to one-half the value of the secondary side voltage V
S
. When the ratio of the power switch's “on” time to “off” time differs from a 50% duty factor (with the duty factor defined by t
on
(t
on
+t
off
)), the output voltage is given by:
V
OUT
=V
S
*t
on
/(t
on
+t
off
).
A drawback of switch mode power circuits as described above is that the switching devices in such circuits are subjected to high stresses and potentially high switching power losses as a result of the switch being changed from one state to another while having a significant voltage across it. These effects increase linearly with the switching frequency of the waveform used to control the power switch. Another drawback of switched power circuits is the electromagnetic interference arising from the large change in current (di/dt) and voltage (dV/dt) that occurs when the switch changes state.
The noted disadvantages of switch mode power converters can be reduced if each power switch in the circuit is caused to change its state (from “on” to “off” or vice versa) when the voltage and/or current through it is zero or at a minimum value. When the switch is changed under a condition of zero voltage or current, the control scheme is termed “zero-voltage” and/or “zero current” switching. In the case of switching at a minimum voltage, the control scheme is termed “low-voltage” switching. It is thus desirable to switch the power switching device(s) at instances of zero or minimum voltage in order to reduce stress on the switch(es) and the sources of power loss of the power supply or converter.
One method of implementing zero voltage switching is to provide a voltage signal across the power switch which passes through a zero value and then to control the switch to change states at the appropriate time relative to that signal. This is conventionally done by introducing a resonant network (for example, a series combination of an inductor and a capacitor) into the power supply circuit. The resonant network is connected to the power switch and acts to smooth the output signal of the power supply and provide a back emf across the power switch in the form of a sinusoidally varying waveform. The resonant elements are arranged so that the back emf waveform generates a zero crossing voltage signal across the power switch while the switch is off. This provides a zero-voltage or zero-current condition through the power switch, which is used to define the desirable switching point(s) for turning the switch on.
During each switching cycle in the operation of such resonantly switched Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) power converters, the voltage across the power switch is driven to zero by the action of the inductive load which is part of the resonant network, and ideally, the switch is then turned on. This typically requires that ZVS Resonant converters have a large LC tank to ensure that there is sufficient inductive energy to drive the voltage across the switch to zero. However, a disadvantage of this means of providing a zero voltage signal across the power switch is that there is a significant power loss associated with the large intrinsic resistance of the resonant network capacitance and inductance, with the power loss being approximately proportional to the values of those elements.
Another important aspect of conventional forward converter circuits is that the magnetic core of the power transformer must be reset after each cycle. This prevents saturation of the transformer core and reduces the losses of the circuit. Power transformer reset is conventionally achieved by use of a tertiary winding which is coupled to the core. However, a disadvantage of this approach is that it complicates the design of the power transformer and typically results in an increase in the size and cost of the transformer.
Another feature of many conventional forward converters is the use of an active clamp as part of the circuit. An active clamp is typically formed from a series combination of a switching element and a clamp capacitor, with the series combination connected in parallel across the primary winding of the power transformer. The active clamp is used to reduce the stress imposed on the power switch and the power dissipated by the switch. An active clamp also can be used to recycle some of the magnetizing current

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Offset resonant ZVS forward converter does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Offset resonant ZVS forward converter, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Offset resonant ZVS forward converter will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2499711

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.