Cleaning compositions for solid surfaces – auxiliary compositions – Cleaning compositions or processes of preparing – For cleaning a specific substrate or removing a specific...
Reexamination Certificate
1997-12-18
2001-01-16
Gupta, Yogendra (Department: 1751)
Cleaning compositions for solid surfaces, auxiliary compositions
Cleaning compositions or processes of preparing
For cleaning a specific substrate or removing a specific...
C510S130000, C510S427000, C510S430000, C510S437000, C510S477000, C510S481000, C510S488000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06174846
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to liquid cleansing compositions of the type typically used in skin cleansing or shower gel compositions which compositions are lamellar phase compositions. Such lamellar compositions are characterized by high zero shear viscosity (good for suspending) while simultaneously being very shear thinning such that they readily dispense in pouring.
2. Background
The rheological behavior of all surfactant solutions, including liquid cleansing solutions, is strongly dependent on the microstructure, i.e., the shape and concentration of micelles or other self-assembled structures in solution.
When there is sufficient surfactant to form micelles (concentrations above the critical micelle concentration or CMC), for example, spherical, cylindrical (rod-like) or discoidal micelles may form. As surfactant concentration increases, ordered liquid crystalline phases such as lamellar phase, hexagonal phase or cubic phase may form. The lamellar phase, for example, consists of alternating surfactant bilayers and water layers. These layers are not generally flat but fold to form submicron spherical onion like structures called vesicles or liposomes. The hexagonal phase, on the other hand, consists of long cylindrical micelles arranged in a hexagonal lattice. In general, the microstructure of most personal care products consist of either spherical micelles; rod micelles; or a lamellar dispersion.
As noted above, micelles may be spherical or rod-like. Formulations having spherical micelles tend to have a low viscosity and exhibit newtonian shear behavior (i.e., viscosity stays constant as a function of shear rate; thus, if easy pouring of product is desired, the solution is less viscous and, as a consequence, it doesn't suspend as well). In these systems, the viscosity increases linearly with surfactant concentration.
Rod micellar solutions are more viscous because movement of the longer micelles is restricted. At a critical shear rate, the micelles align and the solution becomes shear thinning. Addition of salts increases the size of the rod micelles thereof increasing zero shear viscosity (i.e., viscosity when sitting in bottle) which helps suspend particles but also increases critical shear rate (point at which product becomes shear thinning; higher critical shear rates means product is more difficult to pour).
Lamellar dispersions differ from both spherical and rod-like micelles because they can have high zero shear viscosity (because of the close packed arrangement of constituent lamellar droplets), yet these solutions are very shear thinning (readily dispense on pouring). That is, the solutions can become thinner than rod micellar solutions at moderate shear rates.
In formulating liquid cleansing compositions, therefore, there is the choice of using rod-micellar solutions (whose zero shear viscosity, e.g., suspending ability, is not very good and/or are not very shear thinning); or lamellar dispersions (with higher zero shear viscosity, e.g. better suspending, and yet are very shear thinning).
To form such lamellar compositions, however, some compromises have to be made. First, generally higher amounts of surfactant are required to form the lamellar phase. Thus, it is often needed to add auxiliary surfactants and/or salts which are neither desirable nor needed. Second, only certain surfactants will form this phase and, therefore, the choice of surfactants is restricted.
In short, lamellar compositions are generally more desirable (especially for suspending emollient and for providing consumer aesthetics), but more expensive in that they generally require more surfactant and are more restricted in the range of surfactants that can be used.
When rod-micellar solutions are used, they also often require the use of external structurants to enhance viscosity and to suspend particles (again, because they have lower zero shear viscosity than lamellar phase solutions). For this, carbomers and clays are often used. At higher shear rates (as in product dispensing, application of product to body, or rubbing with hands), since the rod-micellar solutions are less shear thinning, the viscosity of the solution stays high and the product can be stringy and thick. Lamellar dispersion based products, having higher zero shear viscosity, can more readily suspend emollients and are typically more creamy. Again, however, they are generally more expensive to make (e.g., they are restricted as to which surfactants can be used and often require greater concentration of surfactants).
In general, lamellar phase compositions are easy to identify by their characteristic focal conic shape and oily streak texture while hexagonel phase exhibits angular fan-like texture. In contrast, micellar phases are optically isotropic.
In should be understood that lamellar phases may be formed in a wide variety of surfactant systems using a wide variety of lamellar phase “inducers” as described, for example, in applicants copending application, U.S. Ser. No. 08/789,726 to Puvvada et al. Generally, the transition from micelle to lamellar phase are functions of effective average area of headgroup of the surfactant, the length of the extended tail, and the volume of tail. Using branched surfactants or surfactants with smaller headgroups or bulky tails are all effective ways of inducing transitions from rod micellar to lamellar.
One way of characterizing lamellar dispersions include measuring viscosity at low shear rate (using for example a Stress Rheometer) when additional inducer (e.g., oleic acid or isostearic acid) is used. At higher amounts of inducer, the low shear viscosity will significantly increase.
Another way of measuring lamellar dispersions is using freeze fracture electron microscopy. Micrographs generally will show lamellar microstructure and close packed organization of the lamellar droplets (generally in size range of about 2 microns).
One problem with certain lamellar phase compositions is that they tend to lose their lamellar stability in colder temperatures (e.g., 0 to 45° F.). While not wishing to be bound by theory, this may be because, in cold conditions, the oil droplets become less flexible and the spherical structure characterizing the lamellar interaction breaks into lamellar sheets instead.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Unexpectedly, applicants have now found that certain polymeric emulsifiers, particularly hydrophilic groups modified on one or both ends, preferably both ends, by polyhydroxy fatty acid ester hydrophobic chains (e.g., dipolyhydroxystearate), can be used at small levels to enhance both initial viscosity and low temperature viscosity, thereby providing much more stable compositions.
More specifically, the invention comprises a liquid cleansing composition comprising:
(a) 5% to 50% by wt. of a surfactant system comprising:
(i) at least one anionic surfactant or a mixture of anionic surfactants (e.g., 0.5 to 25% by wt.); and
(ii) preferably an amphoteric and/or zwitterionic surfactant (e.g., betaine) or mixtures thereof (e.g., 0.1 to 25% by wt.);
(b) 0.1% to 15% by wt., preferably 1% to 10% by wt. of a lamellar phase inducing structurant selected from the group consisting of:
(i) C
8
to C
24
unsaturated and/or branched liquid fatty acid or ester thereof;
(ii) C
8
to C
24
unsaturated and/or branched liquid alcohol or ether thereof; and
(iii) C
5
to C
9
saturated fatty acids;
wherein said structurant has a melting point below about 25° C.;
(c) 0.1% to 5%, preferably 0.2% to 3%, more preferably 0.25% to 2% by wt. of a polymeric hydrophilic emulsifier modified on one or both ends, preferably both, with hydrophobic polyhydroxy fatty acid ester chains, (e.g., mono or dipolyhydroxy, C
8
-C
24
fatty acid esters, particularly dipolyhydroxy stearate)
wherein said compositions have initial viscosity of greater than, 40,000 cps measured at 0.5 RPM using T-bar spindle A, preferably greater than 75,000 cps, more preferably from about 90,000 to about 150,000 cps, and freeze thaw viscosity (measured after at least one cycle, prefe
Gupta Yogendra
Koatz Ronald A.
Lever Brothers Company, a Division of Conopco, Inc.
Webb Gregory E.
LandOfFree
Liquid composition with enhanced low temperature stability does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Liquid composition with enhanced low temperature stability, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Liquid composition with enhanced low temperature stability will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2485533