Dynamic information storage or retrieval – Storage or retrieval by simultaneous application of diverse...
Reexamination Certificate
1998-02-20
2001-01-09
Neyzari, Ali (Department: 2752)
Dynamic information storage or retrieval
Storage or retrieval by simultaneous application of diverse...
C369S284000, C369S044220
Reexamination Certificate
active
06172944
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally relates to the field of disc drive mechanisms for reading data from and writing data to data storage discs. More particularly, the present invention relates to the field of magneto-optical (MO) disc drives.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Typical magneto-optical (MO) disc drives record data by locally heating a portion of the disc. MO discs, or media, include a recording layer of a magnetic material. The coercivity of the heated portion of the media is lowered when it is heated by the laser beam. This allows the magnetic polarity in that area to be reversed by an applied magnetic field. In such disc drives, data is read from media by illuminating areas of the storage media with a linearly polarized laser beam. The Kerr rotation effect causes the plane of polarization of the illuminating beam to be rotated. The direction of rotation depends on the magnetic polarity in the illuminated area of the storage media. When the disc is read, the polarization rotation is determined with a pair of optical detectors and a polarization beam splitter to produce an output data signal. Limitations of MO disc drives include data access time and density with which data can be stored.
FIG. 1
is a diagram of prior MO recording system
100
typically used with 130 millimeter (mm) diameter MO media. System
100
is an example of a “substrate incident” recording system. In substrate incident systems, laser light is incident on a thick substrate layer, travels through the substrate layer and is focused on a recording layer below the substrate layer. System
100
includes objective lens
102
for focusing a collimated beam of light on disc
116
. Disc
116
is an example of a typical two-sided MO disc. MO disc
116
includes substrate layers
104
and
114
forming outside layers on opposing sides of disc
116
. Substrate layers of
104
and
114
are made of materials such as plastic polycarbonate and are approximately
1
.
2
mm thick. Recording layer
106
is below substrate layer
104
, and recording layer
112
is below substrate layer
114
. Recording layers
106
and
112
can be made out of any one of a number of well-known materials, such as Th—Fe—Co, a rare-earth transition-metal alloy. The laser light beam passing through objective lens
102
penetrates substrate layer
104
as shown and is incident on a focal point on the surface of recording layer
106
.
System
100
has several disadvantages. One of the disadvantages of system
100
is that it is necessary to apply energy to the recording layer to erase data prior to writing new data. This is because a large, stationary magnetic coil (not shown) having a large inductance is situated on the opposite side of disc
116
from objective lens
102
to assist in the writing process. Because the coil is held at a relatively great distance form the media surface and has a relatively large inductance, the magnetic field cannot be reversed at high frequencies. Therefore, it is necessary to erase data before writing new data. The necessity of erasing before rewriting slows the process of writing data to disc
116
.
Another disadvantage of system
100
is that the density of data stored on disc
116
is relatively low. A further disadvantage of system
100
is that only one side of disc
116
can be accessed at one time. This is because the relatively large coil occupies the space on the side of the disc opposite the objective lens. This space cannot therefore be used for another lens and actuator. In order to access a different side of disc
116
, disc
116
must be removed, turned over, and reinserted into system
100
. Disc
116
, however, provides good data security because relatively thick substrate layers
104
and
114
allow disc
116
to be handled without danger of data loss or difficulty in reading data because of contamination.
FIG. 2
is a diagram of another prior MO recording system
200
.
Collimated light beam
202
passes through objective lens
204
to disc
216
. Disc
216
includes substrate layer
206
that is typically 0.6-1.2 mm thick. Disc
216
further includes recording layer
208
between substrate layer
206
and protective layer
210
. In system
200
, the large, stationary coil of system
100
is replaced by a relatively small coil in flying magnetic recording head
214
. Flying height
212
is maintained by an air bearing created when disc
216
passes under flying magnetic recording head
214
. For writing to disc
216
, a magnetic field created by magnetic recording head
214
is used in conjunction with collimated light
202
which passes through objective lens
204
. The smaller coil of magnetic recording head
214
has less inductance than the large, stationary coil of system
100
. The reduced inductance allows direct overwrite of data on disc
216
by switching the magnetic field.
System
200
still possesses the disadvantage of relatively low storage densities, however. In addition, disc
216
is a one-sided, rather than a two-sided disc, reducing overall storage capacity.
System
200
also has the disadvantage of requiring mechanical coupling of light on one side of disc
216
and magnetic recording head
214
on the other side of disc
216
. Typically, this coupling is accomplished by mechanical linkages that pass from objective lens
202
to magnetic recording head
214
around the edge of disc
216
. The mechanical linkages cannot be allowed to interfere with the movement of objective lens
202
(during focussing) or with disc
216
.
FIG. 3
is a diagram of prior MO recording system
300
. System
300
is an example of an “air incident” design in which a lens is held very close to the media and laser light is incident on very thin protective layer
309
that is over recording layer
308
of disc
318
. System
300
employs flying magnetic recording head
316
, and a two-piece objective lens comprised of lens
314
and lens
312
. Prior art systems similar to system
300
use other lens designs, for example, three-piece objective lens designs. Lens
314
is held extremely close to disc
318
. Collimated light beam
302
passes through lens
312
and lens
314
. Lens
312
and lens
314
are integrated with slider
304
and magnetic recording head
316
. Flying height
306
for system
300
is typically less than the wavelength of the laser light used in reading from and writing to MO disc
318
.
Disc
318
has an MO recording layer
308
over substrate layer
310
. Because in system
300
, flying objective lens
314
is in close proximity to disc
318
, the need for a focus actuator is eliminated. As is known, focus actuators are mechanisms that adjust the height of an objective lens over a disc during read and write operations. In the case of system
300
, the height of flying objective lens, and thus the focus of flying objective lens
314
, is determined by the air bearing created between slider
304
and recording layer
308
during flight.
By maintaining the spacing between flying objective lens
314
and recording layer
308
at less than the wavelength of the laser light used, laser light can be focused in the near field mode of operation. As is known, the near field mode of operation uses the phenomenon of evanescent coupling, which requires that the objective lens be held very close to the recording layer. The use of evanescent coupling to perform recording allows a smaller spot size, and therefore, greater recording densities and better data throughput.
System
300
has several disadvantages. For example, the surface of layer
309
and the surface of lens
314
closest to the disc can be contaminated, causing permanent damage to data and to the disc drive system.
Another disadvantage of system
300
stems from the fact that because there is one objective lens and no focus actuator, the flying height must be tightly controlled. Variations in the flying height and thickness of protective layer
309
(if there is a protective layer; it is possible to have none) over the recording layer must be controlled within the depth of focus tolerance of the flyin
Blakely , Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman LLP
Maxoptix Corporation
Neyzari Ali
LandOfFree
Magneto-optical recording apparatus with magnetic head... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Magneto-optical recording apparatus with magnetic head..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Magneto-optical recording apparatus with magnetic head... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2456949