Intraluminal stent and graft

Prosthesis (i.e. – artificial body members) – parts thereof – or ai – Arterial prosthesis – Stent structure

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C623S001150

Reexamination Certificate

active

06174328

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to a vascular prosthesis, and more particularly to an intraluminal stent which has a flexible and elastic tubular construction with sufficient hoop strength to prevent elastic recoil of balloon-resistant strictures or to produce delayed dilation of those strictures.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The prior art includes a wide variety of intraluminal stents and grafts. For example, Palmaz U.S. Pat. No. 4,733,665 discloses a balloon-expandable intraluminal graft, including an embodiment comprising a wire mesh tube. Intersecting wire members, secured to one another at their intersections by welding, soldering or gluing, form the wire mesh and define a diamond-like pattern. This structure provides a relatively high resistance to radial collapse; but it suffers a number of disadvantages. First it is a rigid structure which cannot easily assume the configuration of a curved vessel which receives it. Second one must use a balloon catheter to expand and implant it. This requirement limits the length of the graft, as does the rigidity.
Other prior stents have more flexible constructions; but they suffer other disadvantages. Wiktor U.S. Pat. No. 4,886,062, for example, discloses a stent which has a relatively flexible construction. This construction includes a deformable wire bent into a zig-zag design and coiled in a spiral fashion. The resulting wire tube has an open configuration with a reduced hoop strength. Each hoop lies essentially isolated from the adjacent hoops and does not obtain substantial support from them. Moreover, the open configuration increases the risk that plaque elements may herniate through the coil. Finally, one must use a balloon catheter to expand and implant it. Thus, the length of the stent cannot exceed the balloon length of available balloon catheters.
The intraluminal stent of the present invention avoids the disadvantages of the prior art stents and grafts. It has sufficient hoop strength to prevent elastic recoil of balloon-resistant strictures. The stent of the present invention has a flexible construction which allows it to follow the curvature of the vessel which receives it. It has an elastic construction which allows implantation without a balloon catheter. This elasticity further allows compression of the structure and recoil upon implantation to produce delayed dilation of the receiving vessel.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, an intraluminal stent includes a predetermined length of wire having a sinuous or zig-zag configuration and defining a continuous helix with a plurality of connected spirals or hoops. A plurality of loop members connect adjacent apices of adjacent helix hoops. The stent is compressible and self-expandable substantially to the configuration prior to compression.
In accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention, an intraluminal stent includes the continuous helix and the plurality of loop members described above. It also includes a prosthetic graft disposed longitudinally of the wire helix within its central opening (or around the wire helix). one or more of the loop members secures the graft to the wire helix. This graft is a flexible, tubular shell which allows the wire helix to contract and recoil.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3868956 (1975-03-01), Alfidi et al.
patent: 3878565 (1975-04-01), Sauvage
patent: 3890977 (1975-06-01), Wilson
patent: 3996938 (1976-12-01), Clark, III
patent: 4149911 (1979-04-01), Clabburn
patent: 4306318 (1981-12-01), Mano et al.
patent: 4425908 (1984-01-01), Simon
patent: 4494531 (1985-01-01), Gianturco
patent: 4503569 (1985-03-01), Dotter
patent: 4512338 (1985-04-01), Balko et al.
patent: 4553545 (1985-11-01), Maass et al.
patent: 4560374 (1985-12-01), Hammerslag
patent: 4577631 (1986-03-01), Kreamer
patent: 4580568 (1986-04-01), Gianturco
patent: 4649922 (1987-03-01), Wiktor
patent: 4655771 (1987-04-01), Wallsten
patent: 4665906 (1987-05-01), Jervis
patent: 4665918 (1987-05-01), Garza et al.
patent: 4681110 (1987-07-01), Wiktor
patent: 4729766 (1988-03-01), Bergentz et al.
patent: 4732152 (1988-03-01), Wallst{acute over (e)}n
patent: 4733665 (1988-03-01), Palmaz
patent: 4739762 (1988-04-01), Palmaz
patent: 4762128 (1988-08-01), Rosenbluth
patent: 4768507 (1988-09-01), Fischell et al.
patent: 4772264 (1988-09-01), Cragg
patent: 4776337 (1988-10-01), Palmaz
patent: 4787899 (1988-11-01), Lazarus
patent: 4800882 (1989-01-01), Gianturco
patent: 4820298 (1989-04-01), Leveen et al.
patent: 4830003 (1989-05-01), Wolff et al.
patent: 4856516 (1989-08-01), Hillstead
patent: 4878906 (1989-11-01), Lindemann et al.
patent: 4886062 (1989-12-01), Wiktor
patent: 4913141 (1990-04-01), Hillstead
patent: 4922905 (1990-05-01), Strecker
patent: 4969458 (1990-11-01), Wiktor
patent: 5019090 (1991-05-01), Pinchuk
patent: 5035706 (1991-07-01), Giantureo et al.
patent: 5041126 (1991-08-01), Gianturco
patent: 5057092 (1991-10-01), Webster, Jr.
patent: 5067957 (1991-11-01), Jervis
patent: 5078726 (1992-01-01), Kreamer
patent: 5078736 (1992-01-01), Behl
patent: 5085635 (1992-02-01), Cragg
patent: 5104404 (1992-04-01), Wolff
patent: 5116365 (1992-05-01), Hillstead
patent: 5123917 (1992-06-01), Lee
patent: 5133732 (1992-07-01), Wiktor
patent: 5135536 (1992-08-01), Hillstead
patent: 5201901 (1993-04-01), Harada et al.
patent: 5242451 (1993-09-01), Harada et al.
patent: 5282824 (1994-02-01), Gianturco
patent: 5314472 (1994-05-01), Fontaine
patent: 5405377 (1995-04-01), Cragg
patent: 5456713 (1995-10-01), Chuter
patent: 5484444 (1996-01-01), Braunschweiler et al.
patent: 5507767 (1996-04-01), Maeda et al.
patent: 5545211 (1996-08-01), An et al.
patent: 5562697 (1996-10-01), Christiansen
patent: 3918736 A1 (1990-12-01), None
patent: 0 145 166 B1 (1985-06-01), None
patent: 0 411 118 A1 (1991-02-01), None
patent: 0 480 667 A1 (1992-04-01), None
patent: 0 508 473 A2 (1992-10-01), None
patent: 0 540 290 A2 (1993-05-01), None
patent: 1 602 513 (1971-01-01), None
patent: 1205743 (1970-09-01), None
patent: 2106190A (1983-04-01), None
patent: WO 89/02755 (1989-04-01), None
patent: WO 91/07928 (1991-06-01), None
patent: WO 92/00043 (1992-01-01), None
Dotter et al., “Transluminal Expandable Nitinol Coil Stent Grafting: Preliminary Report,” Technical Developments and Instrumentation,Radiology, vol. 147, pp. 259-260 (Apr. 1983).
Schetky, “Shape-Memory Alloys,” pp. 74-82.
K. Otsuka et al., “Shape-Memory Alloys-Pseudoelasticity,”Metals Forum, vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 142-152 (1981).
Cragg et al., “Nonsurgical Placement of Arterial Endoprostheses: A New Technique Using Nitinol Wire,”Radiology, vol. 147, No. 1, pp. 261-263 (Apr. 1983).
Cragg et al., “Percutaneous Arterial Grafting,”Radiology, vol. 150, No. 1, pp. 45-49 (1984).
T. W. Duerig et al., “An Engineer's Perspective of Pseudoelasticity,” pp. 369-393.
Cragg et al., “Stents/Vascular Stents,”Interventional Radiology, pp. 686-692 (1990).
D. D. Lawrence et al., “Percutaneous Endovascular Graft: An Experimental Evaluation” (Abstract),Radiology, May 1987, pp. 357-360.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Intraluminal stent and graft does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Intraluminal stent and graft, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Intraluminal stent and graft will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2449694

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.